Search for: "Matter of Holmes v Brown"
Results 1 - 20
of 89
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2020, 7:20 am
” — Oliver Wendell Holmes, Brown University Commencement Address (1897) The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins to Catharine Pierce Wells in connection with her new book, “Oliver Wendell Holmes: A Willing Servant to an Unknown God” (Cambridge University Press, 2020). [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 7:25 am
Jackson’s Unpublished Opinion in Brown v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm
Harlan’s moral vision is memorialized in his lone dissent in Plessy v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 1:46 pm
Brown, Jr – Nov. 9, 2012 – Central District of California Is Sherlock Holmes Still in Copyright? [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:11 am
Klinger v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 2:04 pm
As for Hand, true to his Progressive (as in the early 20th century Progressive movement) ideology, his valedictory lectures at Harvard Law School in the late 1950s denounced Brown v. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 8:08 pm
(“Jerry”) Brown, Jr. by Arthur F. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm
[On Tuesday, April 4, Georgetown Law devoted a session of its faculty workshop to honoring the publication of The Hughes Court: From Progressivism to Pluralism, 1930-1941 (Cambridge University Press, 2022), a volume in the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States, by Mark V. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 5:54 pm
In a ground-breaking decision in Brown v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
” Brown, 947 F. [read post]
30 May 2007, 11:50 pm
This is Part Three of my review of Bruce Ackerman's Holmes Lectures, "The Living Constitution," 120 Harv. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 9:02 pm
That means at least four of the nine justices want to hear the matter. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
For pragmatists, what matters are the conclusions, not the metaphysics. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:02 pm
He acknowledged that, as a logical matter, AIRC followed from the result and rationale in the Smiley v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 12:24 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice
Habeas Relief Denied; Trial Court's Jury Charge Is Deemed Constitutionally Permissible
Brown v. [read post]
4 May 2013, 1:46 pm
Phelps; Brown v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:42 am
On Friday 4 November the matter of Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor will be heard in Courtroom 2 by Lady Hale and Lords Brown, Mance, Kerr and Wilson. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 12:40 pm
McGalliard v. [read post]
28 May 2011, 10:48 pm
Shandil v Sharma, Mundine v Brown, Holmes v Fraser, Ryan v Premachandran, PK v BV, Moumoutzakis v Carpino, Pak v The Korean Times, Woolcott v Seeger, – four NSW Supreme Court, three NSW District Court, one WA Supreme Court. $20,000 – $50,000. [read post]
21 May 2008, 4:36 am
I would rather see gay-rights cases stand with Brown v. [read post]
