Search for: "Matter of Horowitz v Horowitz"
Results 1 - 20
of 120
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2023, 7:56 am
In a contested custody cased, in Matter of Horowitz v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 4:58 am
Horowitz v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 4:03 pm
Horowitz v. [read post]
4 Sep 2016, 5:36 am
Brubaker rather than Rick Horowitz. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 8:49 am
" [Hats off to Ethan Horowitz !] [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 2:37 am
The insurance coverage litigation of which I am aware so far is listed in Table V of the Madoff lawsuit register. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 4:18 pm
Specifically, in Mokler v. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 5:38 am
Pace v Horowitz 2021 NY Slip Op 00392 Decided on January 26, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department illustrates the power of the “date of mistake” statute of limitations in legal malpractice. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 1:33 pm
In Parker v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 7:00 am
On the other hand, the court in Horowitz v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 6:03 am
” In Horowitz v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 4:20 am
We discussed Gilbo v Horowitz 2018 NY Slip Op 31844(U) July 31, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 158727/2017 Judge: Margaret A. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 4:19 am
Gilbo v Horowitz 2018 NY Slip Op 31844(U) July 31, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 158727/2017 Judge: Margaret A. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 6:25 am
For a copy of the Appellate Term’s decision, please use this link: Horowitz v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 8:16 am
In Horowitz v. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 12:40 pm
” Horowitz v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 3:47 am
As a threshold matter, neither Rubenstein nor Horowitz & Rubenstein are alleged to have acted as attorneys in this action, and Judiciary Law § 487 “applies to an attorney acting in his or her capacity as an attorney, not to a party who is represented by counsel and who, incidentally, is an attorney” (Oakes v Muka, 56 AD3d 1057, 1058). [read post]
10 May 2014, 4:59 pm
Complying with the Supreme Court's dictates in Brady v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 6:34 am
In line with the decision of His Honour Judge Horowitz QC in H v S [2011] EWHC B23 (Fam) which I respectfully follow, the talaq is entitled to be recognised as valid in England and Wales. [read post]
