Search for: "Matter of Horowitz v Horowitz"
Results 1 - 20
of 120
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2024, 3:23 am
In view of the conclusive evidence establishing the absence of legal representation by defendants on any personal injury action, the court incorrectly determined that the legal malpractice claim was timely under the continuous representation doctrine (see Pace v Horowitz, 190 AD3d 619 [1st Dept 2021]; Knobel v Wei Group, LLP, 160 AD3d 409, 410 [1st Dept 2018]) and that it was factually sustainable (see Binn v Muchnick, Golieb & Golieb, P.C., 180 AD3d… [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm
[2] Disclosure Pertaining to Matters Involving the Environment and Civil Rights, Release No. 33-5170 (July 19, 1971) [36 FR 13989 (July 29, 1971)] [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:46 am
Corp. v National Union Fire Ins. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 8:49 am
" [Hats off to Ethan Horowitz !] [read post]
10 May 2023, 7:56 am
In a contested custody cased, in Matter of Horowitz v. [read post]
6 May 2023, 7:18 am
From RB v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 5:31 am
As lawsuit-inspiring musicians go, you can’t do much better than 2 Live Crew. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
Smith v Kunkel16 is a case involving an effort to have a court consider an employee's attempt to withdraw his written resignation prior to its effective date. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
Smith v Kunkel16 is a case involving an effort to have a court consider an employee's attempt to withdraw his written resignation prior to its effective date. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 6:13 am
The first of these is Grauband Mollen Dannett & Horowitz v. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 6:38 am
(Matter of E.Z., 2021 WL 5106637, 2021 US Dist LEXIS 212008.) [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 6:01 am
See Horowitz v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 3:47 am
As a threshold matter, neither Rubenstein nor Horowitz & Rubenstein are alleged to have acted as attorneys in this action, and Judiciary Law § 487 “applies to an attorney acting in his or her capacity as an attorney, not to a party who is represented by counsel and who, incidentally, is an attorney” (Oakes v Muka, 56 AD3d 1057, 1058). [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 4:31 am
Unger v Horowitz, 8 AD3d 62, 62 [1st Dept 2004]; see generally McCoy, 99 NY2d at 306 [2002]). [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 7:22 am
See Cannon v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Smith v Kunkel[16]is a case involving an effort to have a court consider an employee's attempt to withdraw his written resignation prior to its effective date. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Smith v Kunkel[16]is a case involving an effort to have a court consider an employee's attempt to withdraw his written resignation prior to its effective date. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Smith v Kunkel[16]is a case involving an effort to have a court consider an employee's attempt to withdraw his written resignation prior to its effective date. [read post]
