Search for: "Matter of Horowitz v Horowitz" Results 21 - 40 of 120
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2021, 4:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Unger v Horowitz, 8 AD3d 62, 62 [1st Dept 2004]; see generally McCoy, 99 NY2d at 306 [2002]). [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 6:14 am by Leland E. Beck
  Nor does it matter that the regulation was prompted by litigation, including this very suit. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm by David Kris
We therefore concluded that these early investigative activities undertaken by the Crossfire Hurricane team were matters of judgment that were permitted by the AG [Attorney General] Guidelines and the DIOG (356). [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 3:23 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In view of the conclusive evidence establishing the absence of legal representation by defendants on any personal injury action, the court incorrectly determined that the legal malpractice claim was timely under the continuous representation doctrine (see Pace v Horowitz, 190 AD3d 619 [1st Dept 2021]; Knobel v Wei Group, LLP, 160 AD3d 409, 410 [1st Dept 2018]) and that it was factually sustainable (see Binn v Muchnick, Golieb & Golieb, P.C., 180 AD3d… [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:18 pm by Kent Scheidegger
"  Twice in recent years  the United States Supreme Court has affirmed the constitutionality of JLWOP for murder cases, first in the Roper v Simmons decision in 2005, then in 2010's Graham v Florida decision. [read post]
21 May 2013, 7:49 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
Beck at Federal Regulations Advisor, The BLT’s Tony Mauro, Paul Daly at Administrative Law Matters, and Jaclyn Belczyk at JURIST. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 2:35 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
"An attorney stands in a fiduciary relation to the client" (Graubard Mollen Dannett & Horowitz v Moskovitz, 86 NY2d 112, 118 [1995]). [read post]