Search for: "Matter of Inman"
Results 1 - 20
of 120
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 8:47 am
On Monday, the eSafety Commissioner took the matter to court and successfully obtained a two-day injunction against X. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Unlike in the US system, Ontario also allows certain matters to be commenced by various ‘flavors’ of Application. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 3:00 am
Do Political Ads Even Matter Anymore? [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
Inman, 436 F.3d 490 (5th Cir. 2006). [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 8:30 am
Judge Inman concurred only in the result. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 2:23 pm
Bishop Wilkins contends that we have jurisdiction to consider his appeal, arguing that the claim involves ecclesiastical matters and thus affects his First Amendment rights. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 7:41 am
This matter has a complicated procedural history, resulting in four Court of Appeals opinions. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:57 am
The court directed the parties to file written submissions on 8 November 2022 and reply submissions on 10 November 2022 to allow the Judge to decide the matter on paper. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 8:12 am
This post summarizes the published criminal opinions from the North Carolina Court of Appeals released on September 20, 2022. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 7:03 am
Mary Inman: Yeah. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 7:40 am
The defendant, who had underlying health conditions, was not entitled to relief on a MAR under G.S. 15A-1415(b)(8) on the basis of his prison sentence being invalid as a matter of law as a form of cruel and unusual punishment due to the coronavirus pandemic. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 4:39 pm
Soon after, she called out what she considered to be the hypocrisy of a Pinterest “Black Lives Matter” post in June 2020 in the wake of mass protests related to George Floyd’s murder. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 2:24 pm
City of Durham, decided today by the North Carolina Court of Appeals, in an opinion by Judge Lucy Inman, joined by Judges Valerie Zachary and Jeffery Carpenter; note that the court ultimately holds for the police officer based on the alleged violation of his department-created procedural rights, not on any substantive protections for his conduct (however laudable the judges might view it to be, if I'm reading the tone of the opening paragraph right): In his first experience negotiating… [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 11:52 am
The court also says that videos of past commercial sex create the risk of future sex trafficking, no matter how old the videos are: “regardless of when the Videos were created, the allegations that the Videos were being retweeted on a massive scale while they remained on the Twitter platform raise a plausible inference that Twitter’s failure to remove the Videos would result in future commercial sex trafficking. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am
As a preliminary matter, the court observed that the defendant again only made a general objection at trial and possibly failed to preserve the issue for appellate review. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 1:35 pm
The law reverses the traditional burden of proof in employment matters, putting the onus on the employer to satisfy the court that it did not take the alleged reprisal against a whistleblower because of the employee’s whistleblowing. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 3:53 pm
While the SEC’s program allows multiple whistleblowers to be eligible for an award in connection with the same matter, it is always preferable to be the first whistleblower to file a tip with the SEC because any subsequent whistleblowers will only be rewarded if they bring additional information above and beyond that included in the first whistleblower’s original report. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 5:58 am
“Fraud involves a question of fact, and the facts must show an intent to deceive on a material matter. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 7:47 pm
Returning the matter to arbitration would introduce additional cost and delay for the parties. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 9:10 am
Four of our whistleblower partners – Eric Havian, Mary Inman, Anne Hayes Hartman, and Marlene Koury – were named to the Lawdragon 2020 list of 500 Leading Plaintiff Financial Lawyers in America. [read post]
