Search for: "Matter of Jacobs v Allen"
Results 1 - 20
of 41
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2009, 5:30 am
Allen-Wright v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 9:11 am
No, the IPKat isn't going into the plumbing business: it's just that his attention has been attracted to another design protection matter that is now heading to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) for a preliminary ruling, Case C-361/15 P - Easy Sanitary Solutions BV v Group Nivelles. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:11 am
Practically speaking, however, the source code coalition has prepared matters to point where it requires little effort from attorneys to take advantage of this issue. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 11:50 am
Allen, Jacob Hazelton, Douglas V. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 2:57 am
UK courts would also be in a better position to move away from unpopular CJEU decisions: the panel pointed to L’Oreal v Bellure (C-487/07) as a good example of this (in which many, including Sir Robin Jacob, criticised the CJEU for finding that “smell-alike” perfumes can infringe trade marks, even in a situation where the seller tells the buyer that the perfume is a smell-alike) (see hereand here) [But what will be the relevance of CJEU judgments issued before… [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 8:27 am
The Download of the Week is McDonald v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 1:48 pm
Green (University of Mississippi - School of Law) has posted McDonald v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 11:24 am
The IPKat's 10th Birthday Seminar on Wednesday 12 June now has over 280 registrants and the venue -- the lovely auditorium in the AmeriKat's London office of Allen & Overy LLP -- only holds 310. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 6:31 pm
The CA v. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 4:22 am
Mr Justice Nugee heard the application and what follows is taken from the transcript.He was keen from the outset to inspect the physical samples of the products, confirming the approach to registered design cases advocated by Sir Robin Jacob in Dyson v Vax:“What really matters is what the court can see with its own eyes. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 3:07 pm
A delay caused protracted litigation in Perius v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 1:39 am
When asked if he thought copyright harmonisation could (and should) be achieved, his view was that it was a matter for the legislature to decide upon. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 10:59 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Jacob Lewandowski v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 6:47 pm
Jacob & Myers had failed to raise a particularized injury. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 2:24 pm
Sir Robin mentioned that overlap was also visible in the Dolly Blue case (William Edge & Sons Ltd v William Niccolls & Sons Ltd [1911] A.C. 693) between patents and passing off. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:58 am
” At the Duke Center for Firearms Law’s Second Thoughts blog, Jacob Charles looks at the implications of Rehaif v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 9:32 am
Kahn v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:10 pm
The AmeriKat was too busy being angry about the Commission's response to a question on the UPC to attend, but one of her wonderful colleagues, Steven Baldwin (Allen & Overy LLP), attended. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 8:45 am
Allen Co. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 11:56 am
Allen, Ethan Hazelton, Douglas V. [read post]
