Search for: "Matter of James S. v Jessica B." Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2022, 11:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  The 9th Circuit in Bosley v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 7:36 am by Camilla Hrdy
Professor Jessica Litman has a fascinating forthcoming book chapter on the history of the Lanham Act and the influence of Edward S. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
”[32] The parties’ intentions are considered a matter of law, and intent is referred to the trier of fact only if a court determines that the document is ambiguous as a matter of law.[33] Under the objective standard, statements of the parties’ intentions carry the greatest weight.[34] In Teachers Ins. and Annuity Ass’n of America v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Tony Yang, George Washington University, Vaccine Sentiment and the Outcomes of Legislative Bills B. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 4:49 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
You can’t be uncertainty averse to both; what matters is relative salience; whether people treat those as losses v. gains, etc.Q: what about people who just decide not to take either risk? [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 8:47 am by Thomas Valenti
Also there is mandatory referral of both criminal matters and civil matters. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
If you want to find the posts that have a particular tag, copy and paste the word(s) into the search box at the top left of this page, and when you find a post that has that tag, click on that tag. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm by Geoffrey Rapp
The Second Circuit invalidates the FCC’s indecency policy in Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. [read post]