Search for: "Matter of Jeremy B."
Results 1 - 20
of 294
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2015, 6:09 am
Jeremy Doernberger, an associate at Anukem Law in Maryland, did an excellent review of this recently. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 1:54 am
This is why The 1709 Blog has decided to launch a poll asking its enthusiastic readers to answer the following question:DO YOU THINK THAT CLOSED SUBJECT-MATTER SYSTEMS ARE NO LONGER ACCEPTABLE UNDER EU COPYRIGHT? [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 1:11 pm
King and Andrew B. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:11 pm
Thomas Johnson & David Pinsky, Representing Claimant: Pre-Arbitration Considerations Jeremy K. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 3:29 pm
It is intolerable no matter who occupies the White House and no matter which party is the majority party in the Senate. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 9:32 am
Alan B. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 1:48 pm
In addition, the Court also considered the needs and best interests of the respondent as well as the need to protect the community akin to Matter of Jeremy L., Matter of Justin H., Matter of Samantha T. and Matter of Ashlie B. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 7:13 am
The court then determined that even if there were no procedural bar to the motion, it would still fail as a matter of law. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 6:01 pm
The question that divides Herstein, Waldron, Marty Lederman, and others is whether an authoritative text forbidding "A or B" forbids conduct that is just A and also forbids conduct that is just B (Waldron and others) or whether it only forbids conduct that is "A and B" (Herstein).At first blush, Waldron seems obviously right about this as a matter of simple logic. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 8:26 am
After him comes Jeremy B. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 11:14 am
” But Section 2 (B), the “show me your papers” provision was upheld. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 12:20 pm
., Jeremy H., A.D. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 2:47 pm
by Jeremy M. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 4:51 pm
by Jeremy M. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 5:39 am
Jeremy R. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 8:12 am
They filed a brief on behalf of Cato and Professor Jeremy Rabkin “in support of DACA as a matter of policy but [the government] as a matter of law. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:55 am
The matter came before General Court of the European Court of Justice (Fifth Chamber), which delivered its judgment last week, on 15 March 2012. 1. [read post]
25 May 2016, 1:25 pm
I expect that this will be the end of the matter. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 3:44 pm
I'm his principal advisor and advocate concerning matters of technology across the agency. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am
Hinds-Radix, Corporation Counsel, New York, NY (Susan Paulson and Jeremy Pepper of counsel), for respondent. [read post]
