Search for: "Matter of Jewish Press, Inc. v New York State Police"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm
Accordingly, we remit the matter to Supreme Court for a determination as to whether it would be unduly burdensome for respondent to comply with petitioner's modified request (see Matter of Jewish Press, Inc. v New York City Dept. of Educ., 183 AD3d at 733; Matter of New York Comm. for Occupational Safety & Health v Bloomberg, 72 AD3d at 162). [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm
Accordingly, we remit the matter to Supreme Court for a determination as to whether it would be unduly burdensome for respondent to comply with petitioner's modified request (see Matter of Jewish Press, Inc. v New York City Dept. of Educ., 183 AD3d at 733; Matter of New York Comm. for Occupational Safety & Health v Bloomberg, 72 AD3d at 162). [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
In any event, the TPVA established that it possessed no such materials (see Matter of Jewish Press, Inc. v New York City Dept. of Corr., 200 AD3d 1038, 1039-1040). [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
In any event, the TPVA established that it possessed no such materials (see Matter of Jewish Press, Inc. v New York City Dept. of Corr., 200 AD3d 1038, 1039-1040). [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
In that case, the four-month limitations period to challenge OCA's determination would have begun on May 27, 2022, when the statutorily mandated 10-day period to respond to the appeal expired (Matter of Jewish Press, Inc. v New York City Dept of Hous. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
In that case, the four-month limitations period to challenge OCA's determination would have begun on May 27, 2022, when the statutorily mandated 10-day period to respond to the appeal expired (Matter of Jewish Press, Inc. v New York City Dept of Hous. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 9:18 am
All but this one reported incident involved public employers, such as corrections departments and police forces. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 5:36 am
See New York Times Co. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 11:58 am
(quoting Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm
See Dayton Area Visually Impaired Persons, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
”[72] Justice L’Heureux-Dubé, however, did not agree that an expression stated in the positive (i.e., a “significant contributing cause”) meant the same thing as one stated in the negative (i.e., “not a trivial cause”). [read post]
