Search for: "Matter of Koch v Koch" Results 1 - 20 of 202
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2012, 5:45 am by Jonathan H. Adler
 As I have tried to stress in all of my posts on this matter (beginning here), I am concerned about the consequences of making Cato subject to the control of the Kochs or any single interest, but not because I believe they will necessarily make Cato more partisan or less principled. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 4:53 am by Jonathan H. Adler
This view is, from what I can tell, widely shared among libertarians who have posted about the matter. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 8:18 am by Jonathan H. Adler
 They will forevermore characterize the Cato Institute as “Koch-controlled” — and, as a legal matter, they will be correct. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 12:58 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
The Kochs also offered to delay this entire matter until after the 2012 elections. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 8:09 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Adler) The commentary on the Koch-Cato continues to multiply. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:14 am
Recall that when some folks on the Left argued that Justice Clarence Thomas should recuse in NFIB v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 3:03 am
Californiastemcellreport noted: Nancy Koch has been hired part-time for six months through Oct. 7 on a $150,000 contract to deal with IP matters. [read post]
17 May 2012, 10:19 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Tort Talkers may recall that I recently reprinted on Tort Talk an article of mine on the Pennsylvania Superior Court case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 2:42 pm by scanner1
CLARK and VICTORIA LYNNE SMITH, Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 11:41 am by Jonathan H. Adler
 Insofar as the goal of an organization like Cato is to influence public policy, public perception matters. [read post]