Search for: "Matter of Lee v Lee"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,303
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
& Appliance v. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 11:42 am
Malone v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
Lee, No. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:31 am
After a Ninth Circuit panel went the other way, [2] the Ninth Circuit agreed to rehear the matter en banc. [3] In a 6-5 decision in Lee v. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:31 am
After a Ninth Circuit panel went the other way, [2] the Ninth Circuit agreed to rehear the matter en banc. [3] In a 6-5 decision in Lee v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
It has provided virtually no guidance on what it means for a matter to present a “major question,” it has provided little guidance on what it means for a matter to present a “major question,” it has provided little guidance on the degree of statutory specificity necessary to provide agency authority over a major question . . . . [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:08 am
Sometimes external environment-level innovation is more efficient: ramps v. stair climing wheelchairs. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 12:53 pm
The Court of Appeals reinstates the case under the rules allowing traumatized plaintiffs to file an untimely claim.The case is Doe v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 7:55 am
In Katz v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 5:55 am
As the DOJ wrote in 1982, an Acting officer’s “stature as a practical matter is . . . somewhat inferior. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 2:36 pm
Case Name: Ronda Gaines v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am
Last Week in the Courts On Monday 17 July 2023 Nicklin J, sitting at the Port Talbot Justice Centre, heard the case of Corey Lee Styles v South Wales Police [2023] EWHC 1835 (KB). [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 12:22 pm
The Fifth Circuit held oral argument on this matter on July 11, 2023. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 6:16 am
The fact that plaintiff's formal termination did not take place for a few months does not undermine her retaliation claim as a matter of law. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
No matter what a court does, they will end the case exactly where they started. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 11:27 pm
Mark Hill & Simon Lee, UK Constitutional Law Association: State, Churches and Chancel Repairs – Twenty Years On: on the twentieth anniversary of the House of Lords decision in PCC of Aston Cantlow v Wallbank [2003] UKHL 37. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 10:41 am
Yesterday's closing argument in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:18 am
Warren is Lee Schubert; and, in all likelihood, Bedoya will continue to work in this town. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Congress has been very clear in the federal securities laws when it intends to preempt state law, such as in the National Securities Markets Improvement Act[44] or the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act.[45] Indeed, such a broad claim of Commission authority might raise issues under the major questions doctrine discussed in West Virginia v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am
Fancourt J commented that this pair have recently had “a lot to say about this matter outside of court. [read post]
