Search for: "Matter of Lewis v Martin"
Results 61 - 80
of 111
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am
On 19 October 2023, there was a costs and consequentials hearing before HHJ Lewis in the case of Ghenavat v Lyons in which the Claimants were awarded their costs. 5RB summarised the decision. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 2:31 pm
Martin v. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 4:07 pm
Why else would any of us think it’s OK to tell them less than the truth as a matter of routine? [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 1:37 pm
Wyman, 397 U.S. 397, 90 S.Ct. 1207, 25 L.Ed.2d 442; Lewis v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 1:37 pm
Wyman, 397 U.S. 397, 90 S.Ct. 1207, 25 L.Ed.2d 442; Lewis v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 3:12 am
BATISTE v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
The 2010 SpeechNow v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:50 am
But to conflate either with the matter of libel reform is to seriously confuse the issues”. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 7:53 am
Martin, 2019 WL 2896444 (6th Cir. 2019); United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:36 am
SAS Inst. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 7:03 am
May 14, 2004); Lewis v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:58 am
The matter was adjourned until next month. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 11:56 am
Allen, Ethan Hazelton, Douglas V. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am
Fancourt J commented that this pair have recently had “a lot to say about this matter outside of court. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 4:13 pm
DLA Piper’s Privacy Matters had a post “European Law on Cookies Guide”. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 6:21 am
Turning to matters that don’t involve Guantanamo detainees or Bergdahl, NSA matters continue to percolate. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 11:50 pm
The matter is part heard On 25 to 28 March 2019 Julian Knowles J heard the trial in the defamation case of Bull v Desporte. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 1:32 am
The matter has been listed for a mention next week. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 1:21 am
Lewis said the Telegraph had misrepresented his views. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
The Court of Appeal directed the matter to return to the High Court to decide whether the act provides “adequate safeguards for the protection of a journalist’s sources or confidential journalistic material in relation to communications obtained by means of a bulk equipment interference warrant”. [read post]
