Search for: "Matter of M/B Child"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,113
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2013, 2:10 pm
[Shondella M.] (2010) and Matter of Christopher R. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 3:47 pm
In rebuttal, on the other hand, police officers M and B identified DS as the woman who had appeared at the apartment after the defendants were arrested, and to whom they had entrusted the child and a wallet which had been found in the apartment containing almost $1,000. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
In Matter of Guardianship of Nicolas Jude B. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 7:34 am
Pappas, Brian M. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:33 am
" As to alimony, since such contributions are excluded from the child support equation and child support carries great weight as a matter of public policy - the New Jersey Child Support Guidelines posit that children should not be forced to live in poverty due to family disruption - it is only sensible and reasonable for such contributions to be similarly be excluded from the alimony calculation. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:29 pm
I’m never quite sure if that is because it is I who sees things in too straightforward terms, or if it is the judge / my opponent who is struggling with the nuance. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 5:57 am
In McKay v Groesbeck, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2014 WL 1910489 (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept.), the Appellate Division pointed out that a party's maintenance and child support obligations are retroactive to the date of the application therefor, and except as otherwise provided, any retroactive amount due… [read post]
30 Jan 2016, 9:12 am
I’m sure that most parents deal with this issue without outside help (court intervention) and deal with it somehow. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
But perhaps that only shows that, like Judge Jackson and President Biden, I'm just another human-skin-wearing lizard apologist for pedophiles. [read post]
6 May 2012, 5:00 pm
Additional Resources: Daniel M. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 8:21 pm
Children are to be treated the same, no matter who their parents are and no matter what the legal status of their parents’ relationship. [33] The continuation of that distinction here for an ill or disabled child of unmarried parents is difficult to justify in the modern era of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 11:05 am
Hite that I'm very pleased to publish here. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 8:30 pm
and, finally, (4) Whether B shares in the remainder interest of the article Sixth Trust as issue of M? [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:32 pm
and, finally, (4) Whether B shares in the remainder interest of the article Sixth Trust as issue of M? [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 7:43 am
Family Court Act section 756-b was added § 8. [read post]
19 May 2008, 5:42 pm
From a First Amendment standpoint, I defer to Volokh's expertise in the matter. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 8:49 am
Law Lessons from ELLEN M. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 9:45 pm
A judge hearing the matter rejected that request as being as essentially a threat to get the victim to cease her rights to receive child support from him, or face continued demands by him for visitation rights. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 9:45 pm
A judge hearing the matter rejected that request as being as essentially a threat to get the victim to cease her rights to receive child support from him, or face continued demands by him for visitation rights. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 4:29 am
Danielle B., 158 A.D.3d 767, 71 N.Y.S.3d 549 [2d Dept. 2018] and Matter of Christopher YY. v. [read post]
