Search for: "Matter of Malik B." Results 1 - 20 of 29
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2023, 6:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Sang Seok Na v Malik & Assoc., P.C. 2023 NY Slip Op 30831(U) March 20, 2023 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 100962/2017 Judge: David B. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:19 am by J
Malik v LB Tower Hamlets [2010] EWHC 2921 (Admin) And so, another council tax/HMO appeal finds its way to the High Court. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 1:17 am
Under this, judiciary can traverse only the territory demarcated for them by the legislature and the executive, and as such, there is no controversy;B. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 10:14 pm by lawmrh
Following his conviction, Malik was sentenced to two years in prison. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 10:59 pm
Ltd. had the occasion to review the law relating to jurisdiction of criminal courts vis a vis the commission of acts / omissions constituting an offence in matters pertaining to Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 6:21 am by Aaron Y. Zelin
He then sent for Ka’b bin Malik (to do the same, but what he composed did not appeal to the Prophet). [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 2:01 am by V.Venkatesan
The CIC relies on the Delhi High Court’s judgment delivered by Justice Ravindra Bhat in Indian Olympic Association v.Veeresh Malik and Others (January 7, 2010), wherein the Court has observed that the expression ‘public authority’ has to be interpreted liberally and not restrictively. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 8:34 am by Susan Hennessey
There is an element of truth to this as a matter of media vocabulary, and certainly there are those in right-wing corners of the media who are quick to call terrorism any act of violence perpetrated by someone from an Arab or Muslim country. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 5:15 am by Nick Robinson
The system is now under challenge in the Delhi High Court in Balraj Singh Malik Vs. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 6:22 am by David Smith
More importantly, the occupier is further restricted by s74(8)(b) in that he can only recover monies paid in the 12 months immediately proceedings his application to the RPT. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 6:22 am by David Smith
More importantly, the occupier is further restricted by s74(8)(b) in that he can only recover monies paid in the 12 months immediately proceedings his application to the RPT. [read post]