Search for: "Matter of Manuel V." Results 1 - 20 of 211
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2010, 7:11 pm by buslawblogger
Roberto Manuel Suarez has posted Business Methods and Patent-Eligible Subject Matter in Light of Bilski v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 9:12 am
Carlos Manuel Vazquez (Georgetown University Law Center) has posted Missouri v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 2:13 pm
Normally you wouldn't reassign the case to a different judge on remand just because the district court judge erroneously granted a judgment as a matter of law on various counts in an excessive force case.But the district judge here is Manuel Real.So the Ninth Circuit does. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 4:02 am
Matter of Gomez v Kelly, 2008 NY Slip Op 07181, Decided on October 2, 2008, Appellate Division, First Department New York City Police Commissioner Raymond W. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 12:14 pm
Carlos Manuel Vázquez (Georgetown Univ. - Law) has posted Missouri v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 9:08 pm
Noriega's case will be heard by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals on January 14, 2009.The Editor interviews Miami Attorney Jon May, who represented General Manuel Noriega at trial and on appeal (along with Attorney Frank Rubino).Some background: In United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:34 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
App.): State v Carpio An excerpt: Manuel Carpio appeals his convictions and sentences for one count of disorderly conduct and one count of unlawful flight from a law enforcement vehicle. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:41 pm
Justice Epstein seems right that in dependency proceedings, once a case involving one child is over, a party gets a new peremptory challenge to the judge when another case is brought shortly thereafter involving a different child (albeit in the same family). [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 6:14 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
"The monkey wrench in this case is a 2017 Supreme Court ruling, Manuel v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 5:01 am by Jeff Kosseff
" A barrier to the NAACP's argument for anonymous speech rights was Lewis Publishing Co. v. [read post]