Search for: "Matter of Marine Midland Bank" Results 1 - 14 of 14
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2018, 11:09 am
Thus, because James lacked standing to bring a bad faith claim against defendant at the time he brought the Insurance Law § 3420 (a) (2) action, we conclude that the doctrine of res judicata does not bar this action (see generally Hunter, 4 NY3d at 269; Summer v Marine Midland Bank, 227 AD2d 932, 934 [4th Dept 1996]), and defendant's motion insofar as it sought to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) was properly denied. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 6:45 pm
The papers submitted in connection with a motion for summary judgment are always viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party (Marine Midland Bank, N.A. v Dino & Artie's Automatic Transmission Co., 168 AD2d 610, 610 [2d Dept 1990]). [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 1:14 pm
[do] not fall within the ambit of the statute" (Oswego Laborers' Local 214 Pension Fund v Marine Midland Bank, 85 NY2d 20, 25; see New York Univ. v Continental Ins. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 9:53 am
Marine Midland, for example, holds that a bankruptcy trustee has no standing to assert claims on behalf of an estate's creditors. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:03 am
., 132 AD2d 296, 303 [1987]; see Marine Midland Bank v Scallen, 161 AD2d 103, 105 [1990]). [read post]
16 Sep 2017, 6:55 am by Stephen Bilkis
The papers submitted in connection with a motion for summary judgment are always viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party (Marine Midland Bank, N.A. v Dino & Artie’s Automatic Transmission Co., 168 AD2d 610, 610 [2d Dept 1990]). [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
GULF COAST MARINE ASSOCIATES, INC.; from Harris County; 14th district (14-06-00662-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 02-14-08) [Dissent in 14-06-00662-CV]08-0261 STUART SPITZER, M.D. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm by Bexis
  In Camden:Public nuisance is a matter of state law, and the role of a federal court ruling on a matter of state law . . . is to follow the precedents of the state’s highest court and predict how that court would decide the issue presented. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:32 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Moreover, a threat to do what a person already has the legal right to do, in this case, to enforce the law, does not constitute duress (Marine Midland Bank v. [read post]