Search for: "Matter of Mark C. Shames"
Results 1 - 20
of 91
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2016, 2:18 pm
Shame on him. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 2:18 pm
Shame on him. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:14 am
As such, they do not rise to the level of exposing C=Holdings to ‘public hatred, shame, obloquy, contumely, odium, contempt, ridicule, aversion, ostracism, degradation, or disgrace. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 6:00 pm
They proposed a commercial resolution to the matter. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 6:00 pm
They proposed a commercial resolution to the matter. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:11 am
That was a shameful decision in 2007. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 2:46 am
Thus some extraneous matter, beyond the mark as registered, could be taken into account. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 7:51 am
It’s not shameful nor the mark of failure. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 1:00 am
This is a shame as this practice deprives the IP community of necessary guidance on essential questions of EU IP laws. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:40 am
”…[288] “Finally, as a matter of principle, I find it difficult to see why it should matter if confusion only arises after the goods have been sold. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 1:14 am
It would be a shame if it is not taken seriously by the DTI. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am
Shaming sanctions for TM bullies? [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 7:04 am
What a shame! [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 7:15 am
The AG also recalled that this provision is not applicable to actions that relate to a contract.As such, the AG considered whether legal proceedings seeking payment of the fair compensation within Article 5(2)(b) of the InfoSoc Directive concern ‘matters relating to a contract’ within the meaning of Article 7(1)(a) of Brussels I Recast. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 4:06 am
Coty, distribution agreements and luxury brandsA few days ago the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued the much-awaited decision Coty Germany GmbH v Parfümerie Akzente GmbH, C-230/16. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 7:09 am
When can you register a geographical name as a trade mark? [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 12:02 pm
Thus, your offer of settlement is rejected.Added Sibley in an email to C&C:[A]s our response makes clear, Jammie is standing on principle here, and will not accede to payment demands that the RIAA is making thru an unconstitutional statutory scheme (that they lobbied for the creation of) and we will ride this train to it's appellate end no matter how many future remittiturs are rejected.In response to Thomas-Rasset's rejection of the offer, RIAA spokeswoman… [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 2:49 am
This is a shame. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 11:34 am
The underlying message is blaming/shaming. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 6:00 am
C. [read post]
