Search for: "Matter of Mark S."
Results 61 - 80
of 26,678
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2019, 8:47 pm
PatentsPostGrant.com June Webinar June 19 marks the 5th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s impactful decision in Alice Corp. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 6:06 am
As s result, as per the proposed amendment, a rights holder will be able to make a request to the Registrar of Trade Marks to determine a trade mark to be a “well-known” mark. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 1:48 am
In this case the court however seemed to decide the issue, expressly rejecting the doctrine’s application to the defendant’s mark. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 8:58 am
The court denied defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's false marking claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction based on an earlier-filed case involving the same claims. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 7:37 am
Stephen’s Church, LLC (“Lumenary”), to permit construction of a memory-care facility at […] The post IN THE MATTER OF CALVARY TEMPLE OF BALTIMORE, INC., ET AL. appeared first on Maryland Daily Record. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 4:20 pm
” According to the panel, the Supreme Court had never found that a color mark used on product packaging was incapable of being inherently distinctive as a matter of law. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 9:55 am
It filed extensive evidence of the past activities of Mr Gleissner's companies, DTTM's trade mark rights, and the lack of connection between DTTM and Trump International. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 3:06 am
Applicant Allstate moved to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim, asserting that the pleaded marks are not owned by a single entity and therefore cannot, as a matter of law, comprise a family of marks. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 3:12 am
There's no need for the adversary to jump through the fraud hoops: intent doesn't matter. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 12:16 am
The General Court’s decision The General Court annulled the BoA’s decision. [read post]
16 May 2018, 11:03 am
As I'll explain below, McKenna interprets the language of § 2320(f)(1)(A)(ii) to mean that, in order for a defendant's mark to be deemed counterfeit, the mark must be roughly identical with the trademark owner's registered mark exactly as it is registered. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 4:04 am
It was back to the original Titanic ship Quarter trade mark What about Titanic Spa's infringement claim? [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 2:02 am
Harmonization of Product IndicationsAfter last year's implementation of the guidelines on black and white marks, reported by the IPKat here, the time has come for trade mark users, practitioners and examiners to shed light on the impact of non-distinctive or weak components in the assessment of the likelihood of confusion in relative grounds cases.To this end, as announced in OHIM’s Alicante News, the fifth Common Communication covering that aspect of… [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 5:43 am
Does having an affair matter in a Florida divorce? [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 10:52 pm
The third stage considers official’s use of the legislative terms that denote the subject matter protectable by IP regimes with reference to the objects that they denote, focusing in Invention and Plant Variety (chapter 4); The Authorial Work (5) Trade Mark, Other Product Designations, and Goodwil (6) and Design (7). [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 8:46 am
BMW's remaining allegations of infringement of the BMW mark concerned the use of the mark in conjunction with the other side’s trading name "Technosport". [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 3:27 am
It raises the question of what constitutes a “person aggrieved” for the purposes of standing under s 92 to seek removal of a trade mark for non-use. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 5:17 am
” Because its claims regarding popularity, trust, and a history of quality were “anchored as a factual matter to the FLANAX mark’s history ‘in the Latino American market,’” they weren’t puffery. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 4:02 am
What are Europe's trade markjudges cooking up now ...? [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 2:13 am
Comment The judgment shows that reputed trade marks will not always be spared from revocation, and that in the assessment of trade mark use, it matters how customers view the products. [read post]
