Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 701 - 720
of 16,380
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2016, 7:36 am
Military Commissions Chief Prosecutor Mark Martins issued the following statement on Saturday, February 13th: CHIEF PROSECUTOR MARK MARTINS REMARKS AT GUANTANAMO BAY 13 FEBRUARY 2016 Good evening. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 2:54 am
" The Board didn't buy it. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:57 am
An excellent presentation of information using Google maps — here — marking the location of the murals with clickable icons to display a photo of the mural.I got to that via "‘Crisis of expression and creativity:’ Mapping downtown Madison's Black Lives Matter murals" (Capital Times). [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 4:32 pm
He said it's a matter of integrity. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 4:21 am
It didn’t. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 2:06 pm
Pan-European harmonisation of classification within the appropriate international framework [This isn't just a matter of money -- it's a matter of some very obstinate people backing down too].8. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 3:55 am
Do you mark down or mark off (or mark up) the same time that you 'would have' if you were billing hourly? [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 3:03 pm
Their privacy matters. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 8:19 am
Virag argued that Rogersdidn’t apply because the Virag mark didn’t have enough cultural significance to be an integral part of our vocabulary, like Barbie. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 6:24 am
The PTO is supposed to look at the specimen to make sure it shows use as a mark/to see issues that couldn’t have been resolved without a specimen … like whether the specimen shows the mark at all. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 10:26 am
Further factual development was required.Dilution: Defendants correctly pointed out that the marks aren’t famous. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 7:46 pm
” So, does registering your trademark in China guarantee that your organization won’t have imitators or outright trademark violators? [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 3:30 am
It’s a big dispute, they explain to us, and they don’t want a negative mark with the BBB. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 9:48 am
The subject matter of protection is the word as such. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 4:53 pm
The case seemed to indicate that the UK courts may be just as willing as the EPO to enforce a hard-line against added matter in patents.Rose Hughes also discussed the EPO Board of Appeal decision in T 0258/21, which dealt with reliance on a post-hoc identified technical effect of medical use in the absence of any data in the patent application. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 2:05 pm
What you had was this campaign of misinformation which, frankly, caused the reaction that you saw.This isn’t the first time we’ve heard this talking point, and it probably won’t be the last. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 7:11 pm
Mark points out that the risks of blogging for a big firm lawyer aren't worth it when compared to the "awfully intangible benefits. [read post]
31 May 2017, 1:09 am
Having discussed the KitKat chocolate bar saga near ad nauseum, this writer was content that things might've just settled down and the matter finished its course through the courts. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 1:07 am
In the first place, there has been a good deal of trade mark "creep": subject matter such as colours, smells, packaging, product shapes, sounds, motion marks and positional marks which didn't originally attract attention in many jurisdictions, now do so. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 10:51 am
The Supreme Court held in 1918 that “there is no such thing as property in a trade-mark except as a right appurtenant to an established business or trade in connection with which the mark is employed … [T]he right to a particular mark grows out of its use, not its mere adoption. [read post]
