Search for: "Matter of Marriage of Clement"
Results 1 - 20
of 80
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2011, 10:44 am
Congress retained King & Spalding to "defend" the Defense of Marriage Act. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 8:53 am
Clement says he’ll continue working on the same-sex marriage litigation on behalf of U.S. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:41 pm
For those of us who believe the law requires marriage equality for gays and lesbians, the firm's decision to drop the DOMA matter is indeed, as Ben Smith of Politico writes, "a real victory for supporters of same-sex marriage -- and mark[s] what seems like real marginalization for its foes. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 10:11 am
For another, a lawyer who defends an individual or a law, no matter how unpopular or distasteful, helps ensure that the outcome is viewed as fair. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:06 am
The contract hiring King & Spalding's Paul Clement to represent the U.S. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:14 pm
Theodore Olson, the prominent Republican attorney who made headlines when he agreed to challenge California’s same-sex marriage ban, praises Clement’s “abilities, integrity, and professionalism. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 12:32 pm
– a Los Angeles Times staff editorial, defending former Solicitor General Paul Clement and his law firm, King & Spalding, against criticism of their defense of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 1:11 pm
House of Representatives has hired Paul Clement and Clement’s law firm, the venerable King & Spalding, to defend the Defense of Marriage Act. [read post]
11 May 2011, 10:53 am
House of Representatives as a client in same-sex marriage litigation. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 1:27 pm
The agreement between the House Administration Committee and King & Spalding under which the firm, via Paul Clement (principally) and named others, will take on the defense of the Defense of Marriage Act on appeal (which DOJ refused to do) provides certain limitations on the lawyers representing the House in the matter but then goes on to address restrictions on others at the firm. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 12:00 pm
He isn't working yet on the hot-button docket, Clement said: "Steve is terrific and definitely part of the build-up, though at the moment we have him fully occupied doing matters other than DOMA and health care. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 9:46 am
Clement’s letter is here; here’s the key argument:My resignation is ... prompted by the firm’s decision to withdraw as counsel for the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives in defense of Section III of the Defense of Marriage Act. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 8:28 am
The conclusion:Just guessing, but I don’t think Paul Clement’s having been pushed to a smaller firm is going to change the Supreme Court’s judgment on DOMA. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 9:57 am
This is a logical extension of the Court of Appeals decision in Matter of Brooke S.B. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 9:57 am
This is a logical extension of the Court of Appeals decision in Matter of Brooke S.B. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 9:31 am
This agreement outlines the management of financial matters and assets in the event of a marriage dissolution. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 9:31 am
This agreement outlines the management of financial matters and assets in the event of a marriage dissolution. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 8:32 am
Legal Grounds for a NYC Divorce In the state of New York, thelegal grounds for are: Abandonment Adultery Imprisonment Adultery Living separate pursuant a separation agreement Cruel and Inhuman treatment The irretrievable breakdown of the marriage No matter the reason for filing a divorce, you need a good divorce lawyer in NYC. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 2:18 pm
At Bancroft, the D.C. boutique law firm founded by former Assistant Attorney General Viet Dinh, Clement will continue to represent the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the House of Representatives in its defense of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 8:45 am
Last month, Clement informed the First Circuit that the House of Representatives did not oppose an en banc review of Gill. [read post]
