Search for: "Matter of Mays v Stanford"
Results 1 - 20
of 706
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2011, 9:18 am
Today the Supreme Court affirmed (decision here) the Federal Circuit in Stanford v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 12:16 am
In May 1992, Stanford filed the patent application to which the patents-in-suit claim priority. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 4:05 pm
Here is the abstract: A short case-note discussing the UK Supreme Court's decision in Stanford International Bank Ltd (in liquidation) v HSBC Bank plc [2022] UKSC 34. [read post]
8 May 2012, 6:42 am
(i) Stanford International Bank Limited (acting by its joint liquidators) (Appellant) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office (Respondent); and (ii) Stanford International Bank (acting by its joint liquidators) (Respondent) v The Director of the Serious Fraud Office (Appellant) (Oral Hearing) Earlier this year, the Supreme Court heard a complex dispute arising from the collapse of Stanford International Bank (“SIB”) in early… [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 11:49 am
A Constitutional Earthquake: Stanford’s Jane Schacter on SCOTUS Decision to Overturn Roe v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 11:08 am
In a post-Roe v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 12:02 pm
"I've been dealing with Stanford matters since December 2007," says O'Brien, who represents two of Stanford Group Co. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 11:32 am
“Observance of this duty matters most, not least, when we are convinced that others haven’t. [read post]
2 May 2010, 7:58 am
When does identity matter? [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Click image to read Stanford’s Bernadette Meyler on Possible SCOTUS Decision to Overturn Roe v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:28 am
Zelaya, et. al. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 3:45 pm
" Lichtman and Lemley also addressed this point in their Stanford Law Review article: "The lack of empirical evidence on [whether presumptions matter] may be endemic . [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 12:12 pm
Stanford v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 6:05 pm
Under the law in its current form, "[w]hoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter . . . may obtain a patent therefor. [read post]
13 May 2012, 8:31 pm
May 15, 2012 - FDA's New Biosimilar Guidances (Law Seminars International) - 3:00 - 4:00 pm (Eastern) May 16, 2012 - Patent-Eligible Subject Matter after Mayo v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 8:25 am
In this post, Emilija Lazarevic, a trainee solicitor in the litigation team at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the UK Supreme Court in the matter of Stanford International Bank Ltd (In Liquidation) v HSBC Bank Plc. [read post]
8 May 2012, 3:58 am
On Thursday 10 May 2012 is Melanie Tapper v Director of Public Prosecutions (Jamaica), which considers whether a delay of three years between the date of the appellant’s arrest and the date the Court of Appeal handed down judgment on the matter breached the appellant’s right to a fair hearing. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 3:02 pm
That means millions of people who are facing debt collection, eviction, and difficult family law matters must try to represent themselves, often against well-resourced, represented adversaries. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 10:13 pm
Stanford filed the parent to the patents at issue in May 1992. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 10:39 am
In Stanford v. [read post]
