Search for: "Matter of McAvoy v McAvoy" Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2014, 7:03 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals rejects these arguments and affirms the verdict.The case is O'Hara v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 5:45 am
On Monday, the Third Circuit issued a precedential opinion in Capps v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 2:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiffs concede that New York courts have never recognized such an exception, but assert that other states have permitted recovery of emotional damages in legal malpractice actions, citing Kohn v Schiappa (21 NJ Super 235 [1995]), McAvoy v Helikson (277 OR 781 [1977]). [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 7:18 pm by Shawn Wright
 And because all debtors have an absolute duty to disclose matters truthfully, let's just say that it wouldn't look too good at that point! [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 3:53 am by Eoin Daly
The basis for any constitutional challenge to the Government’s  campaign is the Supreme Court’s 1995 judgment in McKenna v An Taoiseach (no 2). [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 11:56 pm by Fiona de Londras
First of all the reduction need only be “said to be” in the public interest, rather than objectively being in the public interest as a matter of fact. [read post]