Search for: "Matter of McCrary"
Results 1 - 20
of 40
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
National/Federal From Pizzagate to the 2020 Election: Forcing liars to pay or apologize Las Vegas Sun – Elizabeth Williamson (New York Times) | Published: 4/2/2024 Michael Gottlieb, a partner at the firm Willkie Farr & Gallagher and a former associate counsel in the Obama White House, is at the forefront of a small but growing cadre of lawyers deploying defamation, one of the oldest areas of the law, as a weapon against a tide of political disinformation. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
National/Federal Supreme Court Rules Public Officials Can Sometimes Be Sued for Blocking Critics on Social Media Associated Press News – Mark Sherman | Published: 3/14/2024 A unanimous Supreme Court ruled public officials can sometimes be sued for blocking their critics on social media. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 3:00 am
Now she is on the hook to pay the city $750,000 to resolve civil penalties related to the matter, according to a settlement proposal. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
National/Federal Meadows Granted Immunity, Tells Smith He Warned Trump About 2020 Claims: Sources ABC News – Katherine Faulders, Mike Levine, and Alexander Mallin | Published: 10/24/2023 Former President Trump’s final chief of staff in the White House, Mark Meadows, has spoken with special counsel Jack Smith’s team at least three times this year, including once before a federal grand jury, which came only after Smith granted Meadows immunity to testify under oath,… [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 8:20 am
Under Colorado's logic, the government may compel anyone who speaks for pay on a given topic to accept all commissions on that same topic—no matter the underlying message—if the topic somehow implicates a customer's statutorily protected trait. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
[Here's a draft of my article, on the constitutionality of anti-BDS laws and other related matters, forthcoming in a symposium at The University of the Pacific Law Review.] [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 5:13 am
McCrary(1976)). [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
Does it matter? [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 2:46 pm
Given the State closure order's lack of narrow tailoring, we cannot say that, as a matter of law, it survives such scrutiny…. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 6:16 am
Frank is director of Auburn University’s McCrary Institute for Cyber and Critical Infrastructure Security. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 4:07 am
Frank is director of Auburn University's Director of Auburn University's McCrary Institute for Cyber and Critical Infrastructure Security. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am
[Just testified this morning before the House Ways & Means Committee Oversight Subcommittee about this.] [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:41 pm
Cilluffo, Director, McCrary Institute for Cyber and Critical Infrastructure Security, Auburn University as witnesses. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 5:01 am
But as a general matter, a decision not to do business with someone, even when it is politically motivated (and even when it is part of a broader political movement), is not protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 5:15 pm
If you just want the copy, it might not matter. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
McCrary (1976), another U.S. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 9:54 am
Constitution that the President be at least 35 years old and Senators at least 30 is unusual and reflects the felt importance of mature judgment to the effective discharge of the duties of these important offices; nor, as the cases we have just cited hold, may Congress or the states supplement these requirements.[7] Federal district courts, including those outside of Chief Judge Posner’s Seventh Circuit, have taken a similar stance.[8] So has persuasive scholarly authority.[9] As a… [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 7:13 am
RT: McCrary was right. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 2:56 am
McCrary, which considered whether private schools could exclude students on the basis of race, a reporter asked President Ford whether “he would leave . . the private, white academies . . . founded in parts of the South . . . as being perfectly legal. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Another question for this pop quiz: A different jurisdiction plans to enact a law that will force Pregnancy Care Centers to discuss the benefits of abortion and refer their patients to abortion clinics, no matter what religious objections they may have. [read post]
