Search for: "Matter of McElroy"
Results 61 - 77
of 77
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
McElroy a cardinal instead of the many bishops who play a large role in this book. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm
Covert, McElroy v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
Lisa McElroy at Drake (anxiety disorder, via an article on Slate); and Prof. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 4:39 am
As Judge Mary McElroy noted in her ruling, this matter was unusual in that the student’s lawyer, James Erhard, made “his case for an unfair proceeding virtually entirely on facts put forth or acknowledged by JWU itself. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 11:47 pm
Ivill, both of whom specialize in health care matters. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 7:36 am
McElroy, 360 U.S. 474 (1959) & Coy v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 6:48 pm
Grisham v Hagan held civilian employees committing capital offenses not amenable to military jurisdiction; this holding was enlarged to embrace noncapital offenses in McElroy v Guagliardo. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 8:50 am
"It was nobody that matters now," he says. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 6:13 am
Johnson thought: McElroy added that they have seriously considered Johnson’s settlement proposals, including one three or four years ago, but found the proposals to be inadequate. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 5:00 am
Johnson that his plan would harm them,” [the neighbors' attorney, Frank] McElroy, said in an emailed response. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 1:34 am
The ruling reinstates a suit by three former Rutgers students against McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:15 am
The competent consumer defense advocate becomes the bad guy for having appealed, only to make matters worse for others in the same boat in the future. [read post]
4 Sep 2010, 11:03 am
Similarly, if you want to know what is happening at the Court this week, it should not matter whether you coincidentally visit the blog soon after we publish a “This Week At The Court Post,” which you otherwise might miss. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:09 pm
As I noted yesterday, the highest court in the U.S. military justice system—the Article I Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (“CAAF”), a circuit-level court with mostly discretionary jurisdiction over each of the service branch courts of criminal appeals—issued the most significant ruling on the scope of U.S. military jurisdiction in the past 25 years. [read post]
3 May 2013, 3:57 am
Thus, trying non-citizens for crimes committed while functionally intertwined with forward-deployed servicemembers in a zone of active combat operations presented the strongest case for military jurisdiction both as a matter of constitutional law and U.S. policy, leaving the harder questions about military jurisdiction over U.S. citizen civilians and/or civilians inside the United States for another day. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:35 pm
Trust and Estate Implications Involving Potentially Incapacitated PersonsS.T. v. 1515 Broad Street, LLC (A-87-18) (081916) Argued November 6, 2019 -- Decided March 9, 2020ALBIN, J., writing for the Court.Only when, through proper legal procedures, a court determines that a litigant lacks the mental capacity to govern her affairs may the litigant be deprived of the right to decide the destiny of her lawsuit. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am
It is true, they are awarded to the one who has been made to suffer; but not as a matter of right. [read post]
