Search for: "Matter of McNeil" Results 1 - 20 of 257
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2009, 12:41 am
Of the substance of patent law matters-->The Examiner had rejected claims for both anticipation and obviousness: "In light of Sasaki, the examiner rejected claims 1 and 3 as anticipated and claim 4 as obvious. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 2:01 pm
Yep, McNeil did something bad and a lawsuit was filed. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:32 am
The crux of the matter is what the phrase “the date of the decision” means. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 12:19 pm by FDABlog HPM
”  “Without preemption,” McNeil states, “OTC drug manufacturers would be deprived of the ability to rely on FDA’s directives as to matters that Congress delegated to the Agency and that fall within the Agency’s unique regulatory and scientific expertise. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:35 pm by John C. Manoog III
Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc., the plaintiff was the administratrix of the estate of a 17-year-old college student who died from a massive, bilateral pulmonary embolism after collapsing in her dorm room in 2009. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 4:37 am by Berniard Law Firm
The First Parish Court ruled in favor of the defendants, finding there was no personal or subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 11:01 pm
The CAFC addressed obviousness in Ortho-McNeil v Mylan (topomax case):Mylan cites KSR International Co. v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 4:08 am
And I agree - if it is legitimate to signal "I have the same qualities as Brand X," it shouldn't matter how that signal is communicated. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 6:06 pm by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento
I’m on a couple of upcoming panels at Printed Matter, Inc. [read post]
6 Jan 2008, 1:18 pm
As a matter of law, brand indifferent consumers don't count in the likelihood of confusion inquiry. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 5:14 pm
Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical v. [read post]