Search for: "Matter of Melendez"
Results 61 - 80
of 163
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2014, 12:40 pm
The People contended that there was an open door policy to question the defendant on evidence given during direct examination according to the People v Melendez 55 N.Y.2d 445. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 9:41 am
See Melendez-Diaz, 557 U.S. at 311 n. 1. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 6:44 pm
Melendez, 55 NY2d 445, the Court of Appeals addressed the issue of opened doors in a murder case. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 10:53 pm
Melendez, 372 S.W.3d 301, 304 (Tex. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 10:53 pm
Melendez, 372 S.W.3d 301, 304 (Tex. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 10:42 am
The fact that the supervisor gave his own interpretation to the data really shouldn't matter (and I think five justices in Williams v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 9:00 pm
Sure, the requirements of the unavailability of the witness in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 6:10 am
It seemed just a matter of time before some of these men turned to lawyers to redress the years of wrongful incarceration they had suffered. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 9:36 am
When the relationship ended in 2004 due to Melendez's infidelity, Vasquez attempted suicide. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 8:52 pm
It is hard to draw too much from comments at argument, of course, but it may be that he is ready to accept Melendez-Diaz as law and make the best of it; he seemed to have turned from emphasizing what he has claimed would be dire consequences of Melendez-Diaz to trying to work out a reasonable and practical way of applying it. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 7:31 pm
" In Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 2:19 pm
Washington in 2004 and then adhered to their strong view in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 2:52 pm
Sweeney : WHETHER THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED AS A MATTER OF LAW IN DECLINING TO APPLY MELENDEZ-DIAZ v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 11:01 am
The Los Angeles judges argued that it did not matter that the officer lacked direct knowledge. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 10:59 pm
I am sorry that four justices remain so desperate to limit the impact of Melendez-Diaz that they are willing to sign on to just about any theory that achieves that objective, no matter how lacking in foundation it might be and what devastation it would work on the confrontation right. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 12:26 am
Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 1:26 pm
Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 2:27 pm
Fifth, as a related matter, the prosecution does not have to present live witnesses testifying to a chain of custody with no breaks whatsoever. [read post]
19 May 2014, 2:56 pm
Washington, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 11:57 am
., we’ve organized by subject matter the dozens of published reports and substantive blog posts about her judicial record. [read post]
