Search for: "Matter of Moore v Evans"
Results 1 - 20
of 51
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court didn’t address and debunk ISL on the merits (as it later did last summer in Moore v Harper), the Court dismissed Texas’s filing on the ground that Texas lacked standing under Article III because “Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another state conducts its elections. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm
[2] Disclosure Pertaining to Matters Involving the Environment and Civil Rights, Release No. 33-5170 (July 19, 1971) [36 FR 13989 (July 29, 1971)] [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 1:53 am
Once a party who has been attacked in such an ad has their attorney notify the station or cable system that the attack ad is false, the station or cable company must investigate the matter and, if the ad is indeed false, pull it from the air. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 2:06 pm
"] From Blankenship v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 5:55 am
In Moore v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 4:42 am
Katelyn Polantz, Sara Murray, and Evan Perez report for CNN. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 12:58 pm
(Evans v. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
Likewise, in State v. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 7:49 am
Katherine Moore v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 5:00 am
In Colgrove v. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 1:24 am
Then there's the Pepper v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 1:05 pm
An amicable resolution of a dispute that last more than two years and was a bit acrimonious at times.Cravath Swaine & Moore's Evan Chesler finished his opening statement (with only about 20 minutes left at the time the settlement became known). [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 3:53 am
” Kathryn Moore has this blog’s analysis of Monday’s oral argument in Smith v. [read post]
19 Jan 2019, 8:13 am
It's a rather iPhone-centric perspective, but the biggest problem here for Qualcomm is that Judge Koh ruled in GPNE Corp. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 4:31 am
Kathryn Adamson and Sarah Evans have a preview at Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute. [read post]
25 May 2018, 6:41 am
Citizens for a Better Environment, the Supreme Court held that federal courts generally may not rule on the merits of a dispute without first determining that it has subject-matter jurisdiction. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 9:10 am
[1] Stolze v Addario [2] Evans v Teamsters [3] This seemed to be the implicit theory in the decision of Moore J. in Turner v Uniglobe in rejecting the employer’s submission to this argument of recall. [4] A payroll over $2.5 million requires severance pay of one week per year to a cap of 26 weeks. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 9:10 am
[1] Stolze v Addario [2] Evans v Teamsters [3] This seemed to be the implicit theory in the decision of Moore J. in Turner v Uniglobe in rejecting the employer’s submission to this argument of recall. [4] A payroll over $2.5 million requires severance pay of one week per year to a cap of 26 weeks. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 4:41 am
After that, it is possible to identify Jones v Saudi Arabia. [read post]
