Search for: "Matter of Moorhouse"
Results 1 - 20
of 31
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2010, 7:27 am
Ann Mari May, Elizabeth Moorhouse, and Jennifer A. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:21 am
Hat-tip to Nearly Legal for drawing attention to the case Holmes-Moorhouse v London Borough of Richmond-Upon-Thames [2007] EWCA Civ 970, which gives important guidance upon the issue of the provision of local authority housing in shared residence cases, something that is likely to become more frequent as shared residence becomes more common. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 8:16 am
The House of Lords Opinions in Holmes-Moorhouse v LB Richmond upon Thames [2009] UKHL 7 were handed down today. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 6:43 am
Moorhouse scheduled a hearing in the matter for 9:30 a.m. next Friday, although the Star said its attorney would try to seek an expedited hearing.The Kansas City Star reports the order here, in a story that concludes:Cases of prior restraint — in which the government tries to prevent the publication of information — are extremely rare. [read post]
1 May 2012, 5:25 pm
For example, [127] and in contrast to Moorhouse at [144] from which iiNet’s situation was “well removed”. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 10:32 am
LAW LIBRARY level 3: KU942.6 .M66 2014Frank Moorhouse, Australia Under Surveillance: How Should We Act? [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 8:19 am
Law Lessons from In the Matter of J.M. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 1:22 am
They also set out matters which must be taken into account in determining whether a person has authorised such an act. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 1:26 pm
In the interim the landlord had served a notice to recover possession but had used the wrong form and didn’t take matters any further. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 11:17 am
What matters is the substance of the assessment not its form. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 5:33 pm
Reassuringly it affirms that Creative Commons is not an anti-copyright device but a provider of handy guidance to would-be users, and it doesn't threaten readers with Moorhouse v University of New South Wales, choosing to explain the legal position instead. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:41 am
In re Moorhouse, 250 N.J. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 5:56 am
This was a matter of substance which, in accordance with the guidance in Holmes-Moorhouse at paragraphs 49 to 51, the reviewing officer should have taken into account. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 12:48 pm
I make no findings in that regard but intend to investigate that matter further when this case returns next week. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 7:38 am
At paragraph 15 he said: “Had A presented herself to any local authority that could be said to have been a matter of choice but she did not. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 7:38 am
At paragraph 15 he said: “Had A presented herself to any local authority that could be said to have been a matter of choice but she did not. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 3:33 pm
It is worth a look not just on the specific issues but as the pre-amble sets out the relevant statute and case law in some detail, including the guidance given in Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond-upon-Thames BC [2009] UKHL 7 ; [2009] 1 WLR 413 on the approach the court should adopt in interpreting review decision letters. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 12:49 am
However that is not the end of the matter so far as this appeal concerned. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:36 pm
The matter was compromised by a consent order that, after providing for the carrying out of a fresh review, dismissed the appeal and varied the costs order in the county court to ‘no order as to costs’. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:36 pm
The matter was compromised by a consent order that, after providing for the carrying out of a fresh review, dismissed the appeal and varied the costs order in the county court to ‘no order as to costs’. [read post]
