Search for: "Matter of Moorhouse" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2020, 11:17 am by Giles Peaker
What matters is the substance of the assessment not its form. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 2:14 pm by Giles Peaker
In this particular reviewing officer’s decision there is not, in my judgment, the material to demonstrate those matters. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 10:32 am by Elim
LAW LIBRARY level 3: KU942.6 .M66 2014Frank Moorhouse, Australia Under Surveillance: How Should We Act? [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:09 am by Giles Peaker
Hotak (Appellant) v London Borough of Southwark (Respondent) Kanu (Appellant) v London Borough of Southwark (Respondent) Johnson (Appellant) v Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council (Respondent)Crisis & Shelter, EHRC, SS for CLG interveners [2015] UKSC 30 The thing about the Supreme Court is that all those years of accrued, encrusted High Court and Court of Appeal case law just don’t matter. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 1:26 pm by Giles Peaker
In the interim the landlord had served a notice to recover possession but had used the wrong form and didn’t take matters any further. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 12:48 pm by Giles Peaker
I make no findings in that regard but intend to investigate that matter further when this case returns next week. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 12:49 am by Giles Peaker
However that is not the end of the matter so far as this appeal concerned. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 7:38 am by Giles Peaker
At paragraph 15 he said: “Had A presented herself to any local authority that could be said to have been a matter of choice but she did not. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 7:38 am by Giles Peaker
At paragraph 15 he said: “Had A presented herself to any local authority that could be said to have been a matter of choice but she did not. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm by NL
”And finally, the usual passage from Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond-upon-Thames LBC [2009] UKHL 7 [at 51] is aired:a decision can often survive despite the existence of an error in the reasoning advanced to support it. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm by NL
”And finally, the usual passage from Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond-upon-Thames LBC [2009] UKHL 7 [at 51] is aired:a decision can often survive despite the existence of an error in the reasoning advanced to support it. [read post]
1 May 2012, 5:25 pm by war
For example, [127] and in contrast to Moorhouse at [144] from which iiNet’s situation was “well removed”. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 1:22 am
They also set out matters which must be taken into account in determining whether a person has authorised such an act. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:36 pm by NL
The matter was compromised by a consent order that, after providing for the carrying out of a fresh review, dismissed the appeal and varied the costs order in the county court to ‘no order as to costs’. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:36 pm by NL
The matter was compromised by a consent order that, after providing for the carrying out of a fresh review, dismissed the appeal and varied the costs order in the county court to ‘no order as to costs’. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am by NL
Whether that is so involves an exercise of “evaluative judgment” … on which the officer’s conclusion will only be challengeable on Wednesbury grounds.30 To summarise, the reviewing officer should treat reg.8(2) as applicable, not merely when he finds some significant legal or procedural error in the decision, but whenever (looking at the matter broadly and untechnically) he considers that an important aspect of the case was either not addressed, or not addressed… [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am by NL
Whether that is so involves an exercise of “evaluative judgment” … on which the officer’s conclusion will only be challengeable on Wednesbury grounds.30 To summarise, the reviewing officer should treat reg.8(2) as applicable, not merely when he finds some significant legal or procedural error in the decision, but whenever (looking at the matter broadly and untechnically) he considers that an important aspect of the case was either not addressed, or not addressed… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm by NL
Birmingham argued that under Part VII Housing Act 1996 generally and indeed under the 1999 Regulations, matters of procedure were usually a matter for the Local Authority. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm by NL
Birmingham argued that under Part VII Housing Act 1996 generally and indeed under the 1999 Regulations, matters of procedure were usually a matter for the Local Authority. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
… In the light of our decision in the present appeal the lawyers preparing for those appeals will have the opportunity to give particular attention to these aspects of the matter. [read post]