Search for: "Matter of Moorhouse"
Results 21 - 31
of 31
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2011, 3:33 pm
It is worth a look not just on the specific issues but as the pre-amble sets out the relevant statute and case law in some detail, including the guidance given in Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond-upon-Thames BC [2009] UKHL 7 ; [2009] 1 WLR 413 on the approach the court should adopt in interpreting review decision letters. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
Whether that is so involves an exercise of “evaluative judgment” … on which the officer’s conclusion will only be challengeable on Wednesbury grounds.30 To summarise, the reviewing officer should treat reg.8(2) as applicable, not merely when he finds some significant legal or procedural error in the decision, but whenever (looking at the matter broadly and untechnically) he considers that an important aspect of the case was either not addressed, or not addressed… [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
Whether that is so involves an exercise of “evaluative judgment” … on which the officer’s conclusion will only be challengeable on Wednesbury grounds.30 To summarise, the reviewing officer should treat reg.8(2) as applicable, not merely when he finds some significant legal or procedural error in the decision, but whenever (looking at the matter broadly and untechnically) he considers that an important aspect of the case was either not addressed, or not addressed… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
Birmingham argued that under Part VII Housing Act 1996 generally and indeed under the 1999 Regulations, matters of procedure were usually a matter for the Local Authority. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
Birmingham argued that under Part VII Housing Act 1996 generally and indeed under the 1999 Regulations, matters of procedure were usually a matter for the Local Authority. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 2:14 pm
In this particular reviewing officer’s decision there is not, in my judgment, the material to demonstrate those matters. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm
”And finally, the usual passage from Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond-upon-Thames LBC [2009] UKHL 7 [at 51] is aired:a decision can often survive despite the existence of an error in the reasoning advanced to support it. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm
”And finally, the usual passage from Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond-upon-Thames LBC [2009] UKHL 7 [at 51] is aired:a decision can often survive despite the existence of an error in the reasoning advanced to support it. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:09 am
Hotak (Appellant) v London Borough of Southwark (Respondent) Kanu (Appellant) v London Borough of Southwark (Respondent) Johnson (Appellant) v Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council (Respondent)Crisis & Shelter, EHRC, SS for CLG interveners [2015] UKSC 30 The thing about the Supreme Court is that all those years of accrued, encrusted High Court and Court of Appeal case law just don’t matter. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
… In the light of our decision in the present appeal the lawyers preparing for those appeals will have the opportunity to give particular attention to these aspects of the matter. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
… In the light of our decision in the present appeal the lawyers preparing for those appeals will have the opportunity to give particular attention to these aspects of the matter. [read post]
