Search for: "Matter of Murphy v Murphy" Results 1 - 20 of 935
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2012, 3:15 pm by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 11-0289, 2012 MT 23, CARL MURPHY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 6:49 am by John McFarland
The Fourth Court of Appeals in San Antonio handed down an opinion this week in Adams v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 7:53 am by John McFarland
The Texas Supreme Court denied the landowners’ motion for rehearing last Friday in Murphy v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:27 am by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) The forthcoming Supreme Court issue of the Harvard Law Review will feature an essay by NYU Law professor Erin Murphy on the Supreme Court’s recent Fourth Amendment case on DNA searches, Maryland v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 4:17 pm by Stephen Bilkis
People v Murphy Court Discusses Whether the Sentence Imposed was Excessive in Driving While Intoxicated Offenses The defendant was convicted of aggravated driving while intoxicated in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 (2-a) (b), driving while intoxicated in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 (2), and driving while intoxicated in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 (3). [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 2:47 am by sally
Football Association Premier League Ltd and others v QC Leisure and others; Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (Joined Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08); [2011] WLR (D) 286 “The clauses of an exclusive licence agreement concluded between a holder of intellectual property rights and a broadcaster constituted a restriction on competition prohibited by article 101FEU of the FEU Treaty where they obliged the broadcaster not to supply decoding devices enabling access to… [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 9:11 pm
It is therefore refreshing to find a judicial opinion that actually applies conservative principles.Yesterday, in the case of Murphy v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 12:00 am by Peter Ling
If this story sound familiar to Kat readers, it is because similar facts were featured in a landmark CJEU decision of 2011, C-429/08 "Premier League v. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 4:27 pm
For wage and hour attorneys, Wednesday's hearing in Murphy v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 11:54 am
Murphy" -- not to mention certain matters governed by a motion in limine. [read post]