Search for: "Matter of Neal v Stanford"
Results 1 - 10
of 10
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2008, 2:24 pm
United States and O’Neal v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 5:05 am
Let the readers decide if that matters, or indeed whether it might even enhance the author’s expertise. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 5:02 am
If the Court wanted to go down the path of emphasizing subjective motivations, it would have decided Trump v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 9:13 pm
Stanford student Lisa Ehrlich discusses last Monday’s argument in No. 07-1209. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 9:49 am
Engel v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
For the symposium on Neal Devins and Lawrence Baum's new book, The Company They Keep: How Partisan Divisions Came to the Supreme Court (Oxford University Press, 2019). [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 5:36 pm
Jeffrey Fisher, the Stanford law professor who argued on behalf of two Philadelphia-area nonprofit groups that entered the case to defend the city’s policy, told the justices that because CSS was a government contractor, all that matters is whether the government’s position was reasonable. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
Paul, Rust v. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 2:20 pm
President Trump’s appointment of Neal Gorsuch to the U.S. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
As with all matters of judicial interpretation, there are matters of nuance and construction. [read post]
