Search for: "Matter of Nephew v Nephew" Results 1 - 20 of 332
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2012, 12:39 am
  One such was Smith & Nephew Plc v Convatec Technologies Inc. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 8:23 am
  There was a great deal of discussion about an added matter objection to the first amendment. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 8:09 am
These are both matters upon which Mr Mellor has placed particular reliance but I do not believe they take him very far. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 3:17 pm
Brighton & Hove City Council v Audus [2009] EWHC 340 (Ch) was an attempt by Brighton to challenge the validity of a second charge on the property held by the titleholder’s nephew, Mr Audus. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 11:30 am
Following a remarkably swift turn-around, the Court of Appeal last Thursday handed down its judgment in KCI Licensing Inc and others v Smith and Nephew plc and others [2010] EWCA Civ 1260.Two patents were in issue: European Patent No. 0 777 504 (‘504) concerning “wound drainage equipment” and No. 0 853 950 (‘950), a divisional of ‘504, concerning “wound drainage canisters” designed to fit in said equipment. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 4:33 am
 According to the recent Generics v Teva/Yeda decision, the burden of proof should therefore be on the alleged infringer, not the patentee. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 10:00 am by Eric Caligiuri
Arthrex, case number 19-1434; Smith & Nephew v. [read post]