Search for: "Matter of Opinion No. 653" Results 201 - 219 of 219
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2017, 3:21 pm
American Contractors Indemnity Co.(2004) 33 Cal.4th 653, 661.) [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Ala. 2011) (“Alabama courts have not recognized such a [heeding] presumption”) (citing Deere).AlaskaIn an nonprecedential, memorandum opinion, the Ninth Circuit predicted that the Alaska Supreme Court would adopt the heeding presumption because of that court’s history of following Restatement comments generally. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
  Wife puts New Baby’s carseat in the front seat, and plows into a telephone pole (or something else, it really doesn't matter). [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 3:08 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
NOTE: The court of appeals' opinion refers to the parties by their real names; they have here been replaced with functional labels In the summer of 2006, the Homebuyers, interested in purchasing a property in Sherman, were driving through a residential neighborhood when they saw a for sale sign in front of the Home-Sellers' home. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 12:33 pm by Joseph L. Hyde
App. __, __, 878 S.E.2d 653, 655, temp. stay allowed, __ N.C. __, 878 S.E.2d 286 (2022)). [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:28 pm by Eugene Volokh
That's particularly so because some readers might view this as influencing my general views on harassment restraining order cases, which I'll doubtless blog about more in the future; I should note, though, that I've been writing and litigating about these matters extensively long before this petition was filed against me (see, e.g., this 2013 article and this 2021 article, plus too many blog posts and briefs to list here). [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
Oct. 18, 2011) warning causation under the learned intermediary ruleIn re Zyprexa Products Liability Litigation, 653 F. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm by axd10
Report of the Council to the membership of the American Law Institute on the matter of the death penalty (April 15, 2009). [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 3:03 pm
  In his view, the matter was fully litigated as part of the merits of the unfair labor practice issue and insubordinate conduct proven sufficient to justify a refusal to hire would a fortiori justify Lundien's discharge if he were an employee. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am by Marty Lederman
As I explained earlier, the crux of plaintiffs’ RFRA claims in Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood is that the HHS “Preventive Services” Rule substantially burdens the religious exercise of the companies’ owners and managers by putting them to an untenable choice between their civil and religious obligations. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
United States District Court, 503 U.S. 653 (1992) .................................................4 Gregg v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
., 127 F.3d 649, 653-54 (8th Cir. 1997).Parts of the Third Restatement could apply in Arkansas, but there's a statute, and we don't like courts playing games with product liability statutes.CaliforniaOnce upon a time, California invented strict liability, and it hasn’t adopted either the Second or Third Restatement formulations. [read post]