Search for: "Matter of Parental Rights of PP"
Results 41 - 60
of 146
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2010, 1:00 pm
Important matters indeed. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 9:45 pm
To the courts PF, the mother of EF, brought judicial review proceedings against the Chief Constable of the police and the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland alleging that, amongst other matters, the policing operation had failed to protect the rights of the parents and children under Articles 2 (right to life), 3 (inhuman and degrading treatment) and 14 (anti-discirmination of the ECHR). [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:25 am
at pp. 380–381.) [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:49 am
However, apart from some fleeting references to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (pp. 16 and 56), there are no references to human rights case law in the Guide. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
More blunt versions include: Where are the right to privacy, reproductive rights, and the right to marry in the text and history of the Constitution? [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 8:27 am
[pp. 84-85] 20. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 8:27 am
[pp. 84-85] 20. [read post]
21 Oct 2006, 10:02 pm
" (pp. 6-7). [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am
In Matter of Karen P. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 4:47 am
Pursuant to Texas law, and with the assistance of an appointed guardian ad litem and attorney ad litem, she sought a judicial bypass of Texas’s parental notification and consent requirements. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 11:03 am
Williams (Simon & Schuster, 2016, pp. 400). [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 12:00 pm
The court concluded that Prop. 8 was unconstitutional because this symbolism mattered, and mattered a lot — the message is injurious to same-sex couples’ (and individuals’) dignity, and may lead to more societal discrimination against gays and lesbians. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:22 am
Pp. 13–26. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:55 pm
It concluded that to determine the habitual residence, the court must focus on the child, not the parents, and examine past experience, not future intentions. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 11:23 am
App. at pp. 6-7. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 7:30 am
Rejecting claims that it violated (1) Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which sets out the right to respect for private and family life, or (2) Article 9, which concerns freedom of thought, conscience and religion, or (3) Article 14, which prohibits discrimination, the European Court of Human Rights, buy its Grand Chamber, held that French law banning full face covering in public did not violate the provisions of the European Convention of Human… [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 6:34 am
Seems right to me. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 8:54 pm
Williams, Reshaping the Work-Family Debate: Why Men and Class Matter (Harvard 2010), 304 pp. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 8:32 pm
" The Federalist No. 28, pp. 180-181 (A. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 11:39 am
READ pp. 72-89· Charles McIlwain, Constitutionalism, Ancient and Modern (Cornell U. [read post]
