Search for: "Matter of Parental Rights of PP" Results 101 - 120 of 146
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2014, 11:18 am by Dennis Crouch
What matters in science is not the access to the data, but the replicability of the results. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 10:57 am by Diane Marie Amann
(pp. 42-43) and Justice Antonin Scalia (pp. 31-32) posed during oral argument of Bond v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 8:11 am by Marty Lederman
Because California recognizes same-sex couples as identical to opposite sex couples with respect to the legal incidents of marriage and parenting, it can claim no rational justification to exclude them from the honor and status of marriage. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 4:48 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
In this narrow third category, ICWA notice is required when the  delinquency court sets a permanency planning hearing to terminate parental rights, or when the court contemplates ordering the ward placed in foster care and announces on the record that the placement is based entirely on abuse or neglect in the family home and not on the ward? [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:00 am by Antonin Pribetic
Particularly, if the foreign court otherwise had subject-matter jurisdiction. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:11 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix Chambers.
All of the appellants are parents fighting their extradition on the grounds that to extradite them would be incompatible with their rights under ECHR, art 8. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:22 am by Blog Editorial
In the matter of Peacock, heard 14 December 2011. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 12:00 pm by Eugene Volokh
The court concluded that Prop. 8 was unconstitutional because this symbolism mattered, and mattered a lot — the message is injurious to same-sex couples’ (and individuals’) dignity, and may lead to more societal discrimination against gays and lesbians. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:00 am by Giesela Ruehl
In some cases the law requires application of the law which favours a particular party (in parent-child relationships, maintenance and guardianship). [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 1:11 am by Peter Bert
It is moving in many respects, despite the lawerly, matter-of-factly language in which it is written, in particular when Sir Michael speaks about his parents, and his father’s death, in Hamburg, in 1948 (pp. 204 et seq.). [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:00 am by Kali Borkoski
There will be no good outcome here, no matter how the case is resolved by the Court. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 9:20 am
Diedjomahor, a case which was decided by recently retired Commissioner Michael McCoy in Indio, California, involving grandparent visitation rights upon the death of a parent per Family Code section 3102. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 9:20 am
Diedjomahor, a case which was decided by recently retired Commissioner Michael McCoy in Indio, California, involving grandparent visitation rights. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 9:20 am
Diedjomahor, a case which was decided by recently retired Commissioner Michael McCoy in Indio, California, involving grandparent visitation rights upon the death of a parent per Family Code section 3102. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 8:48 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
Rather than focus on the problematic uses of the international right of development in jurisdictional gate keeping, I draw attention to the actual nature of the international right to development and its implementation, which has less to do with justiciability (or adjudicated remedies), than the direct implementation and supervision of States. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 4:25 am by Dianne Saxe
Cascades Inc. can be described as the parent company of Cascades. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 1:16 pm by LindaMBeale
  No company would sell its most essential  intellectual property rights to an unrelated third party. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:27 pm
John Collins in this article cited earlier (at pp. 159-60) and restated in his recent book on Adam and Eve (pp. 120-21):1. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 8:25 am by INFORRM
Phelps”, Cardozo Law Review de Novo, pp. 35-42, 2011. [read post]