Search for: "Matter of Parental Rights of PP"
Results 121 - 140
of 147
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2011, 8:25 am
Phelps”, Cardozo Law Review de Novo, pp. 35-42, 2011. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:55 pm
It concluded that to determine the habitual residence, the court must focus on the child, not the parents, and examine past experience, not future intentions. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 3:33 pm
See PDF pp. 92–99 of my Parent-Child Speech and Child Custody Speech Restrictions, 81 N.Y.U. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
Her parents, respondents Hugh and Barbara Cassidy, inherited the rights to Eva’s work. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
Her parents, respondents Hugh and Barbara Cassidy, inherited the rights to Eva’s work. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 9:45 pm
To the courts PF, the mother of EF, brought judicial review proceedings against the Chief Constable of the police and the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland alleging that, amongst other matters, the policing operation had failed to protect the rights of the parents and children under Articles 2 (right to life), 3 (inhuman and degrading treatment) and 14 (anti-discirmination of the ECHR). [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 3:17 am
Canada (Canadian Human Rights Commission), 1987 CanLII 109 (S.C.C.), [1987] 1 S.C.R. 1114 at pp. 1134-1136; Robichaud v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 8:54 pm
Williams, Reshaping the Work-Family Debate: Why Men and Class Matter (Harvard 2010), 304 pp. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:47 am
So that means your own kid can view them in a matter of seconds as well. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
As regards the stay, however, the uncertainty surrounding proponents' standing weighs heavily against the likelihood of their success.Judge Walker here invokes a line of previous authority which draws a distinction between the right to intervene in federal court under Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (whether as a matter of right, or as a matter of the court's discretion), and the standing of an intervenor to appeal from an adverse… [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:34 am
By Steven G. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 12:08 pm
” A majority of SCOTUS will (quite sensibly) not want to be dragged into the minutiae of state property law — or, for that matter, state regulatory policy on guns, state family law on parental powers, and a host of other concerns that are ostensibly the subject of centralized federal rights. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 1:00 pm
Important matters indeed. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 7:37 am
No matter its rationale, the constitutional right to abortion is fundamentally a negative right that rhetorically keeps the state out of the domain of family life. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 9:46 pm
Mr Bateman's letter of complaint to the Law Society of 15 December 2006 was in the following terms:Mr Rob ReisProfessional Standards DirectorThe Law Society of the Australian Capital TerritoryGPO Box 1562Canberra ACT 2601Dear Mr ReisI write to draw your attention (sic) a course of conduct by a legal practitioner in a recent matter, and to ask that you investigate whether that conduct breaches the professional standards expected of a legal practitioner in the Territory.Mr David… [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 5:22 pm
A lengthy summary of the abortion provisions in the bill are in the Chairman's Mark at pp. 28-30 of that document. [read post]
2 May 2009, 7:51 am
It also matters quite a lot, of course, if those people are economically integrated and prosperous. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 12:56 pm
Maybe that means that we'll get it right this time.Anyway, as regular readers of this blog know, Wyeth filed its principal merits brief in Wyeth v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 5:01 am
And ultimately, in later years, Michigan became right. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 8:30 pm
Department of Justice, pp. 2, 6. [read post]
