Search for: "Matter of Park v Kapica" Results 1 - 3 of 3
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2010, 3:50 am
Matter of Park v Kapica, 8 N.Y.3d 302John Park, a police officer employed by the Town of Greenburgh, underwent surgery in June 2002 after sustaining an injury in the line of duty. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 4:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Where the evidence is conflicting and there is room for a choice, a court may not weigh the evidence or reject the Hearing Officer's decision where his or her determination is supported by substantial evidence Citing Matter of Park v Kapica, 8 NY3d 302, the court opined that an employer's "initial award of Section 207-c benefits does not require the continuation of such benefits inasmuch as "[t]he continued receipt of Section 207-c disability… [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:25 am
”Further, said the court, in Matter of Park v Kapica, 8 NY3d 302, the Court of Appeals ruled that "[a] municipality is not permitted to recoup section 207-c payments where … the officer avails himself [or herself] of due process protections by challenging the medical examiner's determination because such a challenge cannot be equated with a refusal to return to duty. [read post]