Search for: "Matter of Posner"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,439
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2013, 12:38 pm
And more generally: We judges and lawyers, we don’t know enough about the subject matters that we regulate, right? [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:28 am
"On Privacy, Free Speech, & Related Matters -- Richard Posner vs David Cole & Others": Ronald K.L. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 5:48 am
But consider whether Judge Posner’s putting on a show to demonstrate his point, that the age of a federal judge does matter and there should be a number where a judge “ages out” of his tenure in office. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 11:42 am
Motorola case will be put before a different judge than Judge Posner. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 10:20 am
"Does Gorsuch matter? [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 3:30 am
For Posner, it is a matter of “urgent concern” to figure out “how the federal judiciary can cope with the increasing complexity of federal cases. [read post]
9 May 2007, 2:46 am
If you take an appeal to the Seventh Circuit in a trade secrets case and you happen to pull Judge Posner on your panel, your arguments will be examined from all sides as will your record and you will learn that the Seventh Circuit continues to look at legal matters with a unique and novel eye. [read post]
4 Dec 2006, 7:27 am
Posner, furthermore, advocates that judges should decide cases in a pragmatic fashion, oriented toward rendering the most reasonable decision in a given case (all things considered).To obtain a sense of Posner's view of these matters, consider his comments (paraphrased):When asked by Leiter whether he thinks that judges have a duty or obligation to apply the law, Posner pointedly does not accept the terms of the question. [read post]
7 Jan 2007, 8:51 am
Corporations have profits to protect, so their view on these matters is easy to understand - and fun to dismiss. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 5:30 am
As a preliminary matter, Judge Posner consolidated the six patent cases that were filed by Brandeis University against various defendants, finding that they involve a number of common issues of law and that judicial efficiency would be maximized by consolidation. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 2:16 pm
The essence of Posner's commentary is found in this passage: "The existence of a tort of abuse of process shows that it has long been thought that litigation could be used for improper purposes even when there is probably cause for the litigation; and if the improper purpose is to use litigation as a tool for suppressing competition in its antitrust sense...it becomes a matter of antitrust concern. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 10:48 pm
But what liberals tend to miss about Posner is that he feels the same way about all proposed methods of interpretation, whether they are based on text, history, structure, doctrine, common law tradition, it doesn't matter. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 2:20 pm
Lots of my favorites really are just aggregators of new and developments just with a little of the author's commentary or take on the matter. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 4:02 am
Obviously, but that’s the difference between people who just want to hate Trump, no matter what the law provides. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 1:30 pm
While he thought it was "too late" to matter, Judge Posner still valiantly took a shot at rescuing the reputation of the ostrich, which, he noted, does not actually stick its head in the sand: The reference of course is to the legend that ostriches when frightened bury their head in the sand. [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 6:49 pm
Judge Posner writes today in the Wall Street Journal, Tuesday, August 22, 2006, on the weirdness of how we approach counterterrorism policy, here:As a judge I cannot comment on the correctness of her decision. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 8:41 am
Hein & Co.) thanked on the acknowledgments page—not 96, as Posner states. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 9:37 am
Posner issued while sitting by designation as a trial court judge in a patent infringement matter: You can access today's Federal Circuit ruling at this link. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 2:14 pm
"Once we got him hoisted up there, it was a matter matter of three minutes to the roof of Ryder [Trauma Center]. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 5:31 pm
It matters because Scalia and Garner are making a descriptive claim: that "textual originalism" is, or at least used to be, standard operating procedure for courts. [read post]
