Search for: "Matter of Potts"
Results 41 - 60
of 77
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2014, 7:06 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts, and as re-enunciated in Matter of Freeman. [read post]
13 May 2014, 6:35 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts, and as re-enunciated in Matter of Freeman. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 7:57 am
Potts says is a very good idea but she has not done so. [read post]
9 May 2015, 5:58 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 9:07 am
Potts, No. 11-0517 (Tex. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 9:05 pm
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a California district court ruling on the matter. [read post]
13 May 2012, 5:06 am
The Pott’s Mercury recently summarized the situation. [read post]
29 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm
President Julie Anna Potts led the NAMI delegation. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:26 pm
v=RxPZh4AnWyk And there was Paul Potts as well: www.youtube.com/watch? [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:11 am
As a rule, a settlement may embrace and be binding upon the court only as to those matters that are within the power of the parties to resolve without prior judicial approval. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 7:23 am
Case library Preliminary injunction brief (if you get an error message downloading one of the files below, hit refresh) Schruers declaration Szabo declaration Veitch declaration Potts declaration Rumenap declaration Esparza declaration Pavlovic declaration Netchoice v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 12:39 pm
Dodge Foundation, Jesse Ball du Pont Fund, Dyson Foundation, Ford Foundation, Hewlett Foundation, Lumina Foundation, Mott Foundation, Potts Family Foundation, Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Winthrop Rockefeller Foundation, Alfred P. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:04 am
Potts, Trash Stealer xiii. 148***Post-sunrise opinion: The morning after, it is possible to see that the SOTU was a campaign speech. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 10:05 pm
See Potts v. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 7:10 pm
(For example, “On my right is Penelope Potts. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 2:02 am
Wilcox J was not prepared to order damages at a reasonable royalty level because, as is typically the case, there was no way Autodesk would have licensed Cheung or, for that matter, that Cheung would have paid for a licence from Autodesk. [read post]
16 Jan 2022, 7:02 pm
Potts(1982), 1982 CanLII 1751 (ON CA), 66 C.C.C. (2d) 219 (Ont. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
App. 1991); Potts v. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 5:45 pm
The court noted it is often impossible to ascertain a motive, so statements on matters of public interest will typically be construed as a statement of comment, and not fact. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:23 pm
Potts, 905 F.2d 367 (11th Cir. 1990). [read post]
