Search for: "Matter of Quick v Glass" Results 1 - 20 of 54
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2006, 4:09 am
A quick look at the use of this phrase in Supreme Court opinions reveals a range of surprisingly different uses of this same topos.The earliest USSC reference to Humpty Dumpty is in a Dissent by Justice Frankfurter in the case of Shapiro v. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 11:37 pm by Frank Cranmer
It is now clear that a literal interpretation of England’s educational laws on this matter is not legally correct. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 2:01 am
The UK High Court decision in Regen Lab v Estar confounds any such expectation. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 3:04 pm by Eric
* Interesting NAD decision involving Coastal Contacts' offer of "free" glasses in exchange for Facebook likes. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 10:46 am by Susan Brenner
They found several baggies containing methamphetamine in the glasses case. . . . [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 4:38 am
The Board was quick in pointing out that the symbolic meaning, impression that a work conveyed, or the intent of the author were irrelevant to whether the Work contained a sufficient amount of creativity (Compendium (Third) §310.3). [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 12:07 am by Frank Cranmer
As a temporary measure, these were replaced with plain glass. [read post]