Search for: "Matter of REA Holding Corp." Results 21 - 40 of 41
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2019, 8:09 am by John Elwood
United States, 19-373Issue: Whether a criminal offense that can be committed with a mens rea of recklessness can qualify as a “violent felony” under the Armed Career Criminal Act. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:40 am by Dennis Crouch
NuVasive, Inc., No. 15-85 (Commil re-hash – mens rea requirement for inducement) 3. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am by Eugene Volokh
Thompson, 947 F.2d 666, 676 (3d Cir. 1991) (so holding as a First Amendment matter, but concluding that Pennsylvan [read post]
18 May 2016, 8:19 am by Dennis Crouch
NuVasive, Inc., No. 15-85 (Commil re-hash – mens rea requirement for inducement) 3. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:22 am by Dennis Crouch
NuVasive, Inc., No. 15-85 (Commil re-hash – mens rea requirement for inducement) 3. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 10:28 am by Ken White
Or is this another case of journalistic malpractice on legal matters? [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 10:28 am by Ken White
Or is this another case of journalistic malpractice on legal matters? [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 10:28 am by Ken White
Or is this another case of journalistic malpractice on legal matters? [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 9:13 pm
(triang. setoff) among multiple affiliates outside of BK not enforceable in BK. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/LehmanBrosInc-BK-SDNY-10-4-11-Peck.pdf … B-NY: Stern inapplic. despite fact that dfdt's concession that matter was core occurred well before Stern was decided. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/Citron-BK-EDNY-Rosenthal-10-6-11.pdf … B-CA analyzes what Stern held & didnt hold, concluding its narrow… [read post]
In his majority opinion, Judge Gorsuch addresses “thorny” questions of administrative law, outlining how the Chevron deference doctrine interacts with Brand X, another administrative law case that holds that an agency’s interpretation of a statute is applied even in the face of circuit precedent, unless that precedent found that the statute at question was “unambiguous” for Chevron purposes. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:48 pm by Edith Roberts
He argued that “as a matter of common sense, common parlance, and common practice, determining whether it is ‘appropriate’ to regulate requires consideration of costs. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 6:41 am by Dennis Crouch
NuVasive, Inc., No. 15-85 (Commil re-hash – mens rea requirement for inducement) 3. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 5:15 am by Ryan Goodman
Who qualifies as a “civilian” versus a “combatant” and why does it matter? [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:20 am by Phil Dixon
Following that line of cases, the majority of the panel vacated the attorney fee order and remanded for a hearing on the matter where the defendant could be personally heard or for “other evidence in the record demonstrating that the defendant received notice, was aware of the opportunity to be heard on the issue, and chose not to be heard. [read post]