Search for: "Matter of Roberts v Borg"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2012, 3:07 am
What we do know is: "Under the circumstances, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion when it, in effect, granted the defendant's motion for leave to amend his answer, as the proposed amendment was neither palpably insufficient nor patently devoid of merit, and there was no evidence that it would prejudice or surprise the plaintiffs (see CPLR 3025 [b]; Matter of Roberts v Borg, 35 AD3d 617, 618; Public Adm'r of Kings… [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 2:57 am
What we do know is: "Under the circumstances, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion when it, in effect, granted the defendant's motion for leave to amend his answer, as the proposed amendment was neither palpably insufficient nor patently devoid of merit, and there was no evidence that it would prejudice or surprise the plaintiffs (see CPLR 3025 [b]; Matter of Roberts v Borg, 35 AD3d 617, 618; Public Adm'r of Kings… [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 12:20 pm
Moleon [v Kreisler Borg Flormari General Construction Co., Inc., 304 AD2d 337, 339 (1st Dept 2003)], supra, at 339. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:21 am
Robert A. [read post]
22 May 2016, 4:05 pm
Google’s general counsel has said “As a matter of both law and principle, we disagree with this demand. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
The defendant argued that the broadcast was subject to reporting privilege under the Defamation Act 1996 and that the publication was on a matter of public interest. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 9:05 pm
- By: Annie KaszinaIn March 2006, there was renewed concern about the patent system, manifested not only in discussion of the NTP v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Robert H. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
Supreme Court Industrial Union Dep’t v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm
Supreme Court said it cannot identify the person who in the spring leaked a draft of the opinion that overturned Roe v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Gaetz was apparently unaware they were being recorded by documentary filmmakers following Stone, whom special counsel Robert Mueller had charged with obstruction of a congressional investigation. [read post]
