Search for: "Matter of Sanchez v City of New York" Results 1 - 20 of 49
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Sanchez v The Department of Education of the City of New York, 2022 NY Slip Op 00954, the Appellate Division held that Sanchez, the petitioner in this CPLR Article 78 action, was not entitled to the restoration of his tenure upon his return from resignation as he failed to provide 30 days' notice of his resignation. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Sanchez v The Department of Education of the City of New York, 2022 NY Slip Op 00954, the Appellate Division held that Sanchez, the petitioner in this CPLR Article 78 action, was not entitled to the restoration of his tenure upon his return from resignation as he failed to provide 30 days' notice of his resignation. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 8:46 pm by Jeremy Saland
Crotty Saland PC is a New York City based criminal defense firm representing those accused of drug crimes throughout New York City and numerous suburban counties. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 8:46 pm by Jeremy Saland
Crotty Saland PC is a New York City based criminal defense firm representing those accused of drug crimes throughout New York City and numerous suburban counties. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 1:15 am
Board of Education of the City of New York, defendants-appellants NEW YORK COUNTYAdministrative LawPetitioner Granted Annulment of Parking Violation Bureaus' Decision; Parking Summons Dismissed Young v. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:15 am
City of New YorkKINGS COUNTYCriminal PracticeTransfer to Civil Status Involves Liberty Interest That Cannot Be Forced on DefendantPeople v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 4:18 am
In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Denicola v Costello, 44 AD3d 990; Tejada v Jonas, 17 AD3d 448; Sanchez v City of New York, 305 AD2d 487). [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 2:29 am by John Diekman
City of New York, NY Slip Op 05787 (1st Dept. 2012).Here is the decision.Tomorrow’s issue: Attorney’s fees in a matrimonial matter. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
Submitted by: Theodore Pollack, Senior Law Librarian, New York County Public Access Law Library. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 1:58 pm
" E-mail: nraymond@alm.com Top Five Securities Arbitration Awards Sanchez et al. v. [read post]