Search for: "Matter of Sealy v Sealy"
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2009, 10:43 am
I don’t think there is any significant point of law or practice in Lemas and Sealy v Williams [2009] EWCA Civ 360, but it is a strange case (although one suspects many readers will have been involved in similarly chaotic cases at one stage or another) and worthy of a short note. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
These and other questions are addressed in a recent decision of interest by the Brooklyn Surrogate's Court in Sealy v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 2:31 pm
Hoeller v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 11:43 am
Link (to PDF of opinion): Christoff v. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 8:21 am
Select Comfort Corp. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:04 pm
In Sealy v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 2:46 pm
Tempur Sealy International, Inc., 2013 WL 6767821 (D. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:06 am
In Sealy v Clifton, LLC (68 AD3d 846 [2d Dept 2009]), the Second Department held that an individual plaintiff, who owned a 50% interest in an limited liability company, did not have "legal capacity to sue" for partition of a property owned by a limited liability company of which he was member. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 3:39 am
In Sealy v Clifton, LLC, 106 AD3d 981 [2d Dept 2013], the court affirmed the Kings County Surrogate’s ruling which we wrote about here, declaring that a New York LLC had been dissolved by operation of law upon the death of a 50% member based on the express language of the LLC’s operating agreement. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:15 am
COLA stated that the matter would be referred to COLA's Contract Fiscal Compliance Unit for a determination. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: US CAFC: Continuation limits invalid; limits on claims and RCEs are ok: Tafas v Doll (Patently-O) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Promote the Progress) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 4:40 am
Far from increasing understanding, matters will end up being litigated in order to gain clarity. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am
This is not simply a matter of the—already controversial[32]—historical attempts by the agency to define under Section 5 conduct that goes outside the Sherman Act. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 8:08 am
Guinness makes a fine stout, and we may look upon it kindly for having nurtured the statistical thinking of William Sealy Gosset. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Directors as a matter of course should have robust information about the independence and aims of director nominees before recommending a vote for or against their candidacy.[5] Once in possession of such information, directors “have a fiduciary duty to disclose to the shareholders the available material facts that would enable them to make an informed decision[.] [read post]
