Search for: "Matter of Sheehan" Results 1 - 20 of 176
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2007, 6:17 pm
ANOTHER UPDATE: More on Cindy Sheehan and the media here. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 2:28 am
I used to have little respect for Cindy Sheehan, whom I though took her grief too far. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 4:00 pm
“As a career prosecutor specializing in complex health care enforcement and recovery matters, Mr. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 3:33 am
This entity may not be a well-understood by most community members, but it plays a role in trust regulation and other activities which hit upon estate planning matters. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 5:45 pm by Jake Linford
IPSC 2016 - Breakout Session III - IP, The Constitution, and the Courts Lexmark and the Holding Dicta Distinction – Andrew Michaels A Problem of Subject Matter: Patent Demand Letters and the Federal Circuit’s Jurisdiction – Charles Duan & Kerry Sheehan Established Rights, the Takings Clause, and Patent Law – Jason Rantanen A Free Speech Right to Trademark Protection? [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 7:04 pm
On these undisputed facts we determine, as a matter of law, that the Sheehans have no reasonable expectation of privacy. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 6:00 am by velvel
This strikes me -- and I think one or two others with whom I regularly discuss matters -- as possibly a bizarre false claim and, if a true claim, as very questionable. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 11:46 am by Jim Walker
Here's one of many comments sent to me on Facebook: "It doesnt matter how much Mr Sheehans got. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 11:49 am
These patients were loved, their families had connections and it didn’t matter. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 10:34 am by charley foster
Summary judgment is a pretrial determination which is granted when the court finds that, given the undisputed facts, the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 7:00 pm by Daniel Cappetta
 Finally, the Court stated that the Commonwealth’s statement that it did not intend to prosecute Sheehan did not render Sheehan’s invocation of his Fifth Amendment privilege invalid, as the practical possibility of prosecution is irrelevant: what matters is whether the Commonwealth could prosecute, not whether it necessarily would. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 4:30 pm by Nathan Koppel
As LB readers may know, we have an avowed affection for judicial rulings with at least a touch of humor, no matter how corny or ham handed. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 1:13 pm
Thank you, Anne [Sheehan] and the Committee for the invitation to join your call today. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 5:02 am
What fills the in-between pages are the details of Cindy Sheehan's protests outside President Bush's ranch in Crawford. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 3:20 am
Numbers only matter when they're part of the pursuit of a championship. [read post]