Search for: "Matter of Soto v City of New York"
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2010, 9:33 am
An employer must consider requirements of Correction Law §753 in evaluating the application of a former convict for employmentMatter of Soto v New York State Off. of Mental Retardation & Dev. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 9:03 pm
City of New York (Contract) Plaza v. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 9:03 pm
City of New York (Contract) Plaza v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 10:02 am
New York City Board of Education Subscription Required [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 2:15 am
New York City Department of Parks and Recreation [read post]
24 May 2010, 8:32 am
Co. v Copfer, 48 NY2d 871, 873).Here, Lexington met its prima facie burden of establishing its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562) by submitting, inter alia, an affirmation of an AIGDC attorney who had handled the Eason claim. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Emails Shed Light on Trump Plan to Employ Fake Electors Las Vegas Sun – Maggie Haberman and Luke Broadwater (New York Times) | Published: 7/26/2022 Previously undisclosed emails provide an inside look at the increasingly desperate and often slapdash efforts by advisers to former President Trump to reverse his election defeat in the weeks before the January 6 attack, including acknowledgments that a key element of their plan was of dubious legality and lived up to its… [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 8:59 am
Village of Hempstead, 397 N.E.2d 737 (N.Y. 1979); Soto v. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 6:25 am
Unable to resolve the matter with EQB, plaintiff sought a federal court injunction. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 9:14 am
Pleading readily achievable Soto v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Genao-Sanchez, No. 05-1402 Sentence for drug conspiracy, conspiring to use a firearm in furtherance of a drug conspiracy, and aiding and abetting the commission of a crime, is vacated and remanded where: 1) the district court's failure to convene a new sentencing hearing deprived defendant the opportunity to argue his position both as to matters of fact relevant to sentencing, and as to the appropriate sentence to be imposed; and 2) thus, the error was prejudicial. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
New Massachusetts companies. [read post]
