Search for: "Matter of Spiller"
Results 41 - 53
of 53
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2010, 4:03 pm
Spiller v Joseph heard 26 and 27 July 2010 (Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson). [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 4:38 pm
Spiller v Joseph heard 26 and 27 July 2010 (Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson). [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
Section 28(2) proclaims that “A child’s best interests are of paramount importance in every matter concerning the child. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:47 pm
There is extensive caselaw on this issue, culminating in the Supreme Court case of Joseph v Spiller [2010] UKSC 53 which is likely to be extremely persuasive if not technically binding. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 1:58 am
The defendants had made no effort to distinguish what could only be factual statements (e.g. the statement that the claimant’s home was 60 miles from the constituency) from matters they claimed were comment or opinion. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am
There has been a great deal of publicity about the need to reform the law of defamation. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 7:10 am
The Supreme Court opted for renaming the defence “honest comment” in Joseph v Spiller [2010] UKSC 53, [2010] 3 WLR 1791 at [117] (for the Court of Appeal, see [2010] ICR 642, [2010] EMLR 7 CA). [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 1:05 am
Spiller. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 5:39 pm
“Cooperation between counsel and good-faith efforts by them to resolve disputes without judicial intervention are essential to the efficient and expeditious administration of justice in this State” Spiller v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm
” Reviewing the words complained of, the House of Lords considered whether, although no facts were expressly referred to, there was a “sufficient substratum of fact stated or indicated in the words which are the subject-matter of the action. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 2:37 am
Moreover, there appears to be no need for the defendant to prove, as the Supreme Court had required in Spiller v Joseph [2010] UKSC 53, that the comment explicitly or implicitly indicates, at least in general terms, the facts on which it is based. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 10:45 am
” [As a certified spiller of things, I can testify to the truth of this.] [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm
There are lots of names for people crossing the border into Texas without authority, including migrants, immigrants, illegals, undocumented noncitizens, illegal entrants. [read post]
