Search for: "Matter of Spiro" Results 1 - 20 of 116
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2010, 9:51 pm by Lawrence Solum
But by demonstrating that people's political and social affiliations do not always map onto the formal boundaries marked by citizenship, Spiro makes clear that we must devise new ways of giving the proper weight and structure to the affiliations that matter most to people. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 4:59 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Spiro (Temple Univ. - Law) has posted A New International Law of Citizenship (American Journal of International Law, forthcoming). [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 9:20 am by Richard Primus
In The New York Timesyesterday, Peter Spiro suggested that Donald Trump’s proposal to bar Muslim immigration, though morally reprehensible, would likely be valid as a matter of prevailing judicial doctrine. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 8:17 am by Jack Goldsmith
I disagree with Peter Spiro’s take on Section 4 of the draft AUMF. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 11:01 am by Ashley Belanger
A person familiar with the matter told Ars that Spiro was never a Twitter employee and wasn't fired. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
Per established procedures, this conclusion ended the CJC’s consideration of the matter. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 6:34 am by Patricia Hughes
(The Globe and Mail here) The Tax Court took the step as a matter of “perception”. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 3:27 am
Scott Leviant is a civil litigation attorney who handles complex and class action legal matters. [read post]
6 May 2010, 6:13 pm by Kenneth Anderson
(Kenneth Anderson) I am not an expert on the law of citizenship in the United States, but my Opinio Juris co-blogger Peter Spiro is. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 8:00 am
 The broad background for this discussion, at least in matters of method, is the general decline of the humanities and the rise of social science as the way of explaining things. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 7:50 am by Elizabeth McElvein
Framed as a matter of national security, 41 percent of Americans (and 83 percent of Republicans) believe that the travel ban makes the U.S. safer. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 12:51 pm by Peter Spiro
  The pragmatic one is that foreigners already wield substantial, direct influence in US politics, so this would be more a matter of degree than kind. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:48 am by Peter Spiro
In addition to being a little silly, entrenching this kind of requirement as a constitutional matter just raises the stakes for inevitable future disputes. [read post]
31 Aug 2013, 7:12 pm by Jack Goldsmith
  Kosovo is the only other real precedent here, and the Clinton administration never explained why it was lawful as an original matter. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 6:59 am by Peter Spiro
by Peter Spiro Mitt Romney is holding a fundraiser this evening in London. [read post]