Search for: "Matter of Tafoya"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2021, 1:52 pm
Like Tafoya, the court held that the extended duration and continuous nature of the surveillance mattered. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 6:00 am
The team’s capabilities include strategic counseling on all matters concerning the labor and employment laws and regulations, as well as individual and collective litigation. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 8:25 am
This case was especially interesting because the court held that Carpenter precluded warrantless access to any amount of cell phone location data, no matter how minimal and no matter whether it was historical or prospective. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 8:33 am
Plaintiff relies on a decision by my colleague, Judge Tafoya, McPherson vs. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 1:46 am
At the evidentiary hearing, the Government argued that the deterrent function was satisfied in this case: Detective Tafoya conducted an unlawful search, and as a result, his illegal drug arrest will not lead to a criminal prosecution. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 1:50 pm
The continued evolution of camera technology, including better resolution and improved low-light performance, might influence how courts think about the matter. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 6:01 am
As a matter of state law, the order would also require Tuttle to surrender any firearms that he might own, for the duration of the order. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
National/Federal A Government Watchdog Says White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows Spent Campaign Funds on Personal Expenditures Business Insider – Yelena Dzhanova | Published: 10/31/2020 Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) is calling for an investigation into White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows after accusing him of misusing thousands of dollars in campaign funds. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
Mukasey, No. 07-2215 "Petition for review of a final order of removal, arising from a conviction for petitioner's grabbing a police officer's fingers and twisting them, is granted and the matter remanded where the BIA's finding that petitioner's state crime of "aggravated battery of a peace officer" was a crime of moral turpitude, was based on a misapprehension of Illinois law. [read post]
